A survey performed by Dutch researchers has in contrast the visible impression of overhead and vertical agrivoltaics farms on close by residents and has discovered that vertical arrays look much less invasive.
Researchers from the Netherlands’ Wageningen College & Analysis assessed the perceived panorama high quality of people that reside subsequent to both an agrivoltaic (AV) system deployed with an overhead configuration and a vertical agrivoltaic array.
Their survey was performed through a sequence of interviews held with individuals who reside subsequent to or cross by two agrivoltaic farms with the 2 completely different configurations positioned within the Dutch province of Gelderland.
“The hyperlink between panorama impacts and assist for renewable vitality initiatives highlights the significance of inspecting the social acceptance of agrivoltaics from a panorama high quality perspective,” the researchers emphasised. “On this analysis, panorama high quality (LQ) is taken into account from a subjective faculty of thought, inspecting particular person experiences of two landscapes together with the meanings ascribed by the panorama customers.”
The overhead system that was thought-about within the survey is positioned in Wadenoijen, and it was constructed in March 2021 over 3.7 hectars of land. Earlier than the set up of the AV system, the plot was used as a redcurrant farm, and the fruit remains to be being grown there underneath the panels.
The vertical AV, however, is positioned in Culemborg in a pasture space. It began working in August 2022 over an space of 0.7 hectares, and other than pasture, it additionally hosts a small subject with herbs and vegetation, a beehive, in addition to timber and shrubs.
The survey was performed with a complete of 62 respondents, 32 residing shut the vertical farm in Culemborg and 30 close to the overhead system in Wadenoijen. It included 24 questions, all associated to the use, experiential, and future values. “Use worth refers to practical suitability and effectivity, experiential worth pertains to id and that means, and future worth considers effectivity and sustainability over time,” the lecturers defined.
The use worth was represented within the survey by questions relating to the elements of accessibility, multifunctionality, the involvement of farmers, environmental impacts, and recreation and group actions. The experiential worth was represented, however, by elements of attractiveness, well being & well-being, wildlife habitats, and visible look, whereas future worth refers to stability/flexibility and cultural and panorama growth.
“The outcomes reveal that respondents favored vertical interspace AV over overhead AV,” the scientists said. “The use worth elevated within the case of vertical interspace AV (12%) however decreased within the case of overhead AV (- 11%). The experiential worth was decreased in each instances (-11% for the interspace AV and -16 % for the overhead AV). The longer term worth elevated barely for each AV programs (2%).”
Within the case of the vertical farm, the expertise of visible look was decreased by 3% after the plant building, a minor change in comparison with the 24% within the overhead case. The overheard plant additionally decreased the perceived optimistic impact on wildlife by 60%, whereas the vertical AV modified it by 48%. Well being & well-being high quality expertise dropped by 28% within the vertical case and 33% within the overhead plant.
The outcomes additionally confirmed that within the case of the vertical panels 90% of the residents believed that involving farmers within the vitality transition is an effective factor, whereas within the overhead the speed was 80%. Within the case of overhead AV, the issue of environmental impacts was most pivotal within the lower of the use worth with a discount of 147%, in comparison with adverse 8% within the vertical case.
When requested to rank an important elements to them, environmental impression was on prime with 13%, adopted by well being and well-being with 12%, and wildlife habitats with 12% as nicely. Recreation and group actions, attractiveness, and accessibility obtained the bottom quantity of solutions, with 7%, 6%, and 5%, respectively.
“Whereas agrivoltaics signify a possible answer for land allocation challenges of photo voltaic vitality infrastructure, the experiential worth of landscapes – as evidenced on this analysis – warrants extra consideration,” the lecturers concluded. “Though this examine examined two explicit kinds of AV within the Netherlands, the findings additionally present instructions for agrivoltaics developments elsewhere.”
The survey was introduced within the paper, “Panorama person experiences of interspace and overhead agrivoltaics: A comparative evaluation of two novel kinds of photo voltaic landscapes within the Netherlands,” which was just lately printed in Power Analysis & Social Science.
This content material is protected by copyright and will not be reused. If you wish to cooperate with us and want to reuse a few of our content material, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.