Shila Devi Tharu, a 47-year-old farmer in western Nepal, incessantly loses her rice crop to floods. “Virtually yearly my rice fields are inundated, damaging the crop partially or absolutely,” says Tharu, who cultivates 1.2 acres of land within the Karnali river basin of the Bardiya district.
Thauru receives compensation from both the provincial authorities or the municipal authorities, as a one-time grant of rice, oil, salt and different provisions. The extent of compensation required is decided by these authorities however, whereas she welcomes the assist, Tharu says it by no means fully offsets her losses.
Local weather change and floods in Nepal
In current many years, landslides have claimed the most human lives in Nepal, however floods happen with a higher frequency and have an effect on extra individuals. Nepal, which accounted for lower than 0.1 per cent of the full quantity of greenhouse gasses emitted globally throughout 2020, is struggling disproportionately from local weather change. In response to a 2021 report by Nepal’s Ministry of Forests and Atmosphere: “Climate or meteorological occasions elevated temperatures, and hazards reminiscent of erratic rainfall, drought, and floods brought on by them account for about 90 p.c of crop loss in Nepal.”
This aligns with a 2014 particular briefing on Nepal by the Intergovernmental Panel on Local weather Change, which forecast an “enhance in financial losses from weather- and climate-related occasions”. In 2019, Nepal’s local weather change coverage made provisions for climate-induced catastrophe insurance coverage in agriculture and animal husbandry; the federal government at present gives subsidies masking 75 per cent of crop and livestock losses.
Sadly – as Tharu has discovered – the premiums on these insurance coverage insurance policies are excessive and the payouts inadequate.
“
Farmers had been reluctant to insure their crops earlier than, as they needed to undergo a sophisticated course of for the payout.
Bikram Rana, undertaking supervisor, Sensible Motion
Automated payout thresholds
This 12 months nonetheless, Tharu’s predicament eased. Underneath a brand new, index-based flood insurance coverage scheme initiated by Sensible Motion – a civil society organisation – in collaboration with Shikhar Insurance coverage, Tharu routinely certified for a payout of NPR 3,600 (USD 27) when water ranges on her farmland exceeded 10.8mm throughout 0.1 acres; the premium for this coverage was NPR 1,000 in 2022.
Ramesh Gautam from Sensible Motion South Asia says the organisation modelled climate information for the index and helped to develop its automated payout thresholds. Gautam provides that Sensible Motion’s foremost position has been in serving to to construct consciousness in regards to the scheme amongst farmers.
The automated payout method sidesteps the necessity for a claimant to show their losses and for the supplier to undertake prolonged verifications. As an alternative, the insurer references information offered by Nepal’s Division of Hydrology and Meteorology. This type of flood insurance coverage was launched in Bardiya district in March 2021, amongst 935 farmers throughout 12 cooperatives. It has since been prolonged to Kailali district in southwestern Nepal and now covers 4,278 farmers throughout 46 cooperatives.
The Third Pole spoke to Bikram Rana, Sensible Motion’s index-based flood insurance coverage undertaking supervisor: “Farmers had been reluctant to insure their crops earlier than, as they needed to undergo a sophisticated course of for the payout.” He provides that this various payout course of is easy and clear, and extra farmers are being attracted.
Challenges and incentives for insurance coverage corporations
Although this scheme advantages farmers, the information suggests it could not show worthwhile for insurers as flood occasions turn into extra frequent. In response to Shikhar Insurance coverage’s Bardiya department head Dhundiraj Rijal, the corporate paid out nearly NPR 3.5 million to farmers in Bardiya final 12 months, however collected simply NPR 900,000 in premiums. Rijal tells The Third Pole that he doubts reinsurance suppliers would proceed supporting index-based insurance coverage schemes if such losses occurred extra incessantly sooner or later.
Rijal tells The Third Pole that one of many present scheme’s shortcomings is that it solely covers one river basin, the Karnali. “Increasing the scheme to many different river basins would minimise the danger as there are lesser possibilities of [large flooding] in all of the rivers on the similar time,” he says.
For Shikhar Insurance coverage nonetheless, index-based insurance coverage schemes have execs in addition to cons. In response to Rijal, insurers can save important sources as a result of there isn’t a want for post-disaster assessments. For this reason Shikhar Insurance coverage has been slowly increasing its weather-based insurance coverage schemes since launching its first product of this nature in Could 2016: the coverage was offered to apple farmers within the district of Jumla, who qualify for a payout if lower than 60mm of rain falls between the primary week of April and the primary week of June.
This apple farming coverage makes use of roughly 25 years of rainfall information from Nepal’s Division of Hydrology and Meteorology to mannequin crop manufacturing shortfalls, says Shikhar Insurance coverage’s Jumla department supervisor, Deepdarsan Fadera. He tells The Third Pole that this scheme has grown from 35 to 4,200 policyholders and now consists of the neighbouring districts of Mugu and Dolpa.
The success of this scheme inspired Shikhar Insurance coverage to supply index-based drought insurance coverage in Jumla from 2019: if annual rainfall is lower than 800mm, lined farmers are entitled to a payout. About 10 per cent of the farmers in Jumla have opted for the scheme up to now.
Reluctance to supply index-based insurance coverage
Regardless of the obvious success of Shikhar Insurance coverage’s weather-based index schemes, no different insurers are leaping in. The most important purpose, in response to Fadera, is that the federal government doesn’t present the subsidies for these schemes that it does for others. The second massive purpose, says Fadera, is that Nepal merely doesn’t have sufficient climate stations to supply the long-term information that these indices require.
One other main impediment to index-based insurance coverage in Nepal has been governmental permission, says Gautam. Traditionally, the authorities have been granting permission per 12 months and per area solely. In response to Gautam, the federal government is more and more keen to grant everlasting permissions, which may immediate different corporations to supply these merchandise. One such firm could possibly be Himalayan Everest Insurance coverage. Its head of crop and cattle insurance coverage, Manohar Adhikari, tells The Third Pole that they’re getting ready a pilot undertaking to check the idea.
Others stay cautious, reminiscent of Krishna Timsina on the Nepal Agricultural Analysis Council. Talking to The Third Pole, Timsina is reticent to assert success for weather-based index insurance coverage “based mostly on the outcomes from a couple of locations”.
“There is no such thing as a doubt that the product is useful from the view of farmers if designed correctly, however the main problem stays within the designing, and in creating infrastructure for its implementation,” Timsina provides.
One such design flaw is to solely observe whole rainfall throughout a sure interval. This implies farmers should not compensated if very heavy rainfall is interspersed with very dry durations, which additionally causes crop losses.
Such issues had been underlined by a weather-based index insurance coverage research revealed in 2022, which used mid-season rice yields information from China’s province of Anhui. It concluded that the success of one of these insurance coverage calls for detailed information, specifically month-by-month information of crop yields in relation to climate occasions. The research additionally supplied cautionary tales: “regardless of substantial premium subsidy (usually in extra of 60 per cent), index-based insurance coverage piloted in Malawi and India has not been very profitable, with participation charges of solely 20-30 per cent.”
Timsina says rather more session with “stakeholders from completely different fields” is required to design merchandise match for the numerous impacts of local weather change. Moreover, Timsina says real-time information from climate stations inside 5 kilometres of insured areas is critical.
Putting in so many climate stations to make this product out there to farmers in lots of elements of Nepal could be financially tough for the nation.
“If we will overcome the challenges of correct product design and ample infrastructure via the involvement of each governmental and non-governmental sector, farmers may get a invaluable weapon to battle the harm of a altering local weather,” concludes Timsina.
That is according to findings elsewhere: Thailand was one of many first Asian international locations to supply weather-based index insurance coverage, the place a 2022 research concluded that “cooperation between the private and non-private sectors in selling climate insurance coverage as a crucial measure to guard farmers” was key to its success. The research, which checked out sugarcane, rice, palm oil and rubber crops, confirmed that weather-based index insurance coverage may considerably scale back the potential dangers of local weather change for farmers.
Restricted authorities assist
The federal government’s insurance coverage regulatory physique, Nepal Insurance coverage Authority (NIA), is at present learning index-based fashions. “It’s simpler to draw farmers to this coverage as there are not any hassles within the claim-settlement course of,” Susil Dev Subedi tells The Third Pole. Nonetheless, Subedi, who directs the NIA’s agriculture, micro-insurance, reinsurance and analysis division, can also be cautious: “The most important complication [to expanding the scheme] is that each a part of the nation must have completely different coverage, because the climate occasions are completely different elsewhere.”
In response to Subedi, the federal government doesn’t have fast plans to subsidise such schemes, because it does for conventional insurance coverage schemes.
In the meantime, it is going to proceed to be tough for farmers in Bardiya to afford index-based insurance coverage premiums with out state assist. That features Anita Chaudhary, who tells The Third Pole she insured roughly 0.1 acres of her land with an index-based insurance coverage coverage, as a result of her fields lie in a flood-prone space. In 2022, her premium was NPR 750 and he or she was rewarded NPR 2,700 in payouts when the floodwaters arrived. For now, nonetheless, Chaudhary nonetheless has one other 2.3 acres that she can’t afford to guard.
This story was revealed with permission from The Third Pole.
