Scope 3 emissions are tough to measure. Few industries know this higher than the chemical compounds sector, which is the third largest emitter – globally.
Whereas monitoring Scope 1 and a pair of emissions could also be easy, monitoring Scope 3 emissions presents extra challenges because it features a firm’s oblique emissions, that are sometimes tougher to trace.
In response to a Deloitte report, Scope 3 emissions within the chemical compounds {industry} – that are chargeable for 75 of all its emissions – stem from three foremost sources: bought items and companies; emissions ensuing from utilizing a product, corresponding to fertilisers or refrigerants; and the emissions occurring on the finish of a product’s life when it’s landfilled, incinerated, or recycled.
The chemical compounds sector alone has seen its emissions enhance by 6 per cent since 2013. It launched 186 million metric tonnes of CO2e in 2022, Environmental Safety Company (EPA) figures be aware.
The {industry}’s emissions should “decouple” from manufacturing by 2030 to extend the probabilities of a web zero situation by 2050, in keeping with 2023 findings by the Worldwide Vitality Company (IEA), which means that manufacturing processes should be modified or changed with low-carbon alternate options that emit both considerably much less or zero carbon emissions.
IEA findings additionally famous that the chemical compounds sector’s emissions should peak within the subsequent few years and decline by roughly 15 per cent relative to present ranges by 2030 to fulfill web zero emission targets.
On the similar time, a lot of the world will depend on this sector; chemical merchandise are integral to virtually each side of each day life, from the cleaning soap used to scrub our palms, medicines to deal with sicknesses, to the supplies utilized in building, transportation, and electronics.
This makes the chemical compounds {industry} one of many largest industries worldwide, with an estimated annual income of US$4.7 trillion, notes a McKinsey report.
“Addressing Scope 3 emissions is essential as a result of they symbolize a good portion of the {industry}’s impression on local weather change,” famous Maria Valentina Giraldo Martinez, co-chair of Collectively for Sustainability’s (TfS) Scope 3 Greenhouse Gasoline (GHG) emissions programme. “Attaining web zero targets requires complete emission discount throughout all the worth chain – not simply inside an organization’s operations.”
TfS is a worldwide non-profit initiative based by chemical firms to advertise sustainability practices within the {industry}’s provide chain.
Hurdles in monitoring emissions
The Deloitte evaluation, which appears at 250 publicly traded chemical firms, discovered that whereas over half report their Scope 1 and a pair of emissions, solely 30 per cent report Scope 3 emissions. The report attributed this to challenges in monitoring emissions outdoors the reporting firm’s management.
From a provide and worth chain perspective, chemical firms have advanced provide chains with a number of suppliers, which complicates emissions monitoring throughout all the worth chain. There are greater than 42,000 particular person chemical compounds in US commerce alone, in keeping with EPA knowledge, with the quantity rising to 150,000 or extra globally.
Gathering correct knowledge on emissions from suppliers additionally poses difficulties on account of various reporting requirements and knowledge availability. The low charge of Scope 3 emissions reporting makes it tough to calculate the complete carbon footprint of a particular product. As an alternative, many firms seek advice from industry-average knowledge or input-output databases to estimate emissions, whereas these monitoring Scope 3 typically use different knowledge codecs and measuring methods.
Corporations lack direct management over their suppliers’ practices, making it tougher to affect emission reductions, whereas technical diversifications current additional hurdles, famous Giraldo Martinez.
“To cut back Scope 3 emissions, chemical firms must make choices that may embody altering some applied sciences, adapting manufacturing processes or sourcing supplies, which may take time and sources,” she stated.
Corporations should due to this fact collaborate higher with suppliers to scale back emissions from bought items, in any other case generally known as Scope 3.1 emissions, famous Peter Saling, director, sustainability strategies, at international chemical firm BASF. Saling additionally leads standardisation efforts to measure GHG emissions knowledge in TfS’ Scope 3 GHG Emissions Programme.
“For Scope 3.1, the suppliers are vital as a result of they’re those who can scale back these emissions. For Scope 3 ‘downstream’ emissions, the impression on the businesses is even decrease,” Saling stated, referring to the Scope 3 emissions that happen later in a chemical firm’s worth chain, which may embody the downstream transportation of merchandise, use of offered merchandise, and end-of-life remedy.
“This may result in extra significant product carbon footprint calculations,” he added.
“
Chemical firms that lead in Scope 3 reporting can profit by figuring out worth chain emissions sources and strategically decreasing them, which may create worth for his or her enterprise.
Maria Valentina Giraldo Martinez
Exterior pressures pushing for change
Regulatory strain can also be driving chemical firms to hunt options, with these failing to deal with emissions risking reputational injury, and the lack of investor confidence and enterprise loyalty.
Extra regulators are requiring chemical firms to reveal their full carbon footprint, together with Scope 3 emissions. This contains regulators within the European Union, Turkey, Nigeria, and Brazil, with governments in New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, and Taiwan additionally contemplating Scope 3 disclosures from firms.
That is encouraging, Giraldo Martinez famous, as it can push stakeholders throughout the worth chain to trace, report and reduce emissions to fulfill discount targets.
Nonetheless, a scarcity of industry-specific steering and standardised calculations is hampering the chemical sector’s capability to ship correct and clear reporting of Scope 3 emissions.
At present, the Greenhouse Gasoline (GHG) Protocol – a worldwide standardised framework for measuring, managing, and reporting greenhouse gasoline emissions developed by the World Assets Institute (WRI) and the World Enterprise Council for Sustainable Improvement – supplies requirements and instruments that assist nations and cities hint their progress towards local weather targets.
Whereas the GHG Protocol’s Company Worth Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Normal presents particulars on all Scope 3 classes, necessities, and steering for reporting emissions, it isn’t particular to the chemical {industry}.
It’s due to this fact nonetheless as much as chemical firms to reference the GHG Protocol, famous Saling. “A very powerful requirements are ISO requirements and the GHG protocol, nonetheless, they’re voluntary requirements and can’t deal with particular wants and calculation approaches for the chemical firms. Within the regulatory framework, new laws is underneath growth, relying on the area,” he stated.
He added that the EU taxonomy and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism are regulatory frameworks that may change into more and more vital, particularly amongst European chemical firms.
It takes two to fulfill Scope 3
TfS goals to fill the gaps left within the GHG Protocol and assist chemical firms via its Scope 3 GHG Emissions Programme, which is a set of pointers that measure emissions impression within the sector.
The programme strives to assist chemical firms persistently decide their carbon footprint, determine emission sources of their worth chains and strategically scale back them.
TfS has created a Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) Guideline as a part of its Scope 3 GHG Emissions Programme, offering particular directions on calculating emissions from the extraction of uncooked supplies as much as the manufacturing of the ultimate chemical product. The rule applies to most chemical merchandise and hopes to standardise PCF calculation approaches throughout the {industry}.
Giraldo Martinez famous that chemical firms that lead in Scope 3 reporting can profit by figuring out worth chain emissions sources and strategically decreasing them, which may create worth for his or her enterprise.
The PCF Guideline may also be used to calculate product emissions in different industries, particularly people who depend on chemical merchandise, added Saling.
“A number of different sectors use chemical {industry} merchandise, so they need to have the ability to settle for the PCF calculations as nicely. The PCF Guideline can be utilized as a ‘drop-in resolution’ for different sectors, such because the automotive {industry},” he says.
With many chemical firms new to calculating their PCF, the PCF Guideline goals to reply particular questions on lowering Scope 3 emissions and result in extra standardised carbon footprint calculations, Saling highlights.
One other device is TfS’ PCF Change resolution, a platform that helps chemical firms to calculate their carbon footprint based mostly on the PCF Guideline and trade emissions knowledge and finest practices between firms or prospects and suppliers.
The platform additionally permits stakeholders to faucet into provider engagement instruments and coaching to drive the discount of their Scope 3 GHG emissions.
“Regardless of having a totally practical device, the {industry} stays considerably nascent concerning upstream PCF knowledge trade. To handle this, we’re actively partaking with suppliers, urging them to calculate and share PCF knowledge. Our efforts embody creating strong supporting and onboarding supplies for suppliers, engagement sources for our members, and coaching through the TfS Academy,” stated Giraldo Martinez, referring to TfS’s on-line sustainability coaching platform.
With an growing variety of customers choosing sustainable items, Saling concludes {that a} business-as-usual method can’t be sustained, noting that the chemical {industry} has to scale back emissions at pace to additionally keep buyer loyalty and belief down the road.
“Local weather change stands as the best problem of the twenty first century, and it requires us to adapt our processes and reshape our product portfolio accordingly. We should expedite this transformation to make sure that our merchandise proceed to be accepted by society,” he stated.
