Actual World Hydrogen Refueling Stations With Electrolysis Far Much less Environment friendly Than Assumed

Join every day information updates from CleanTechnica on electronic mail. Or observe us on Google Information!

Unsurprisingly, in the case of hydrogen, the extra real-world knowledge assortment and evaluation that’s completed and printed, the more serious it appears. The newest black eye for the tiny molecule that so many love is within the effectivity of creating hydrogen at refueling stations.

The Hydrogen Analysis and Fueling Facility (HRFF) at California State College, Los Angeles, has been in operation since 2014. It was the primary station within the U.S. licensed to promote hydrogen commercially on a per-kilogram foundation. Positioned close to main highways, it serves each campus automobiles and public gasoline cell electrical automobiles, with capability for 15–20 automobiles every day. The station produces hydrogen on-site utilizing a 60 kg/day alkaline electrolyzer, shops it at excessive strain, and dispenses it at 350 and 700 bar, catering to varied hydrogen-powered car wants.

As a result of it’s not solely a working station, however on a analysis facility, researchers have been capable of get rather more knowledge about its operations than for many of the few hundred stations world wide. Additional, in contrast to most stations, which get truckloads of grey hydrogen delivered and pressurized, it’s an embodiment of the utopian finish state of the style, getting renewable electrical energy delivered and making hydrogen near the place it’s allotted.

As a reminder, that is the mannequin that the Worldwide Council on Clear Transportation (ICCT) utilized in its fatally flawed examine on street freight decarbonization in Europe. There was an enormous clue that one thing was problematic with that examine within the main graphic, which confirmed inexperienced hydrogen manufactured at truck stations and utilized in gasoline cell vehicles would have a price of power per kilometer traveled solely barely increased than electrical vehicles charged on the identical stations. Provided that battery electrical automobiles are about 3 times as environment friendly electron to wheel as gasoline cell automobiles, this was a startling discovering, and bizarrely one which they defended.

That led to a trawl by 5 years of their hydrogen transportation research discovering innumerable errors, maybe most startling being once they used the hypothetical greatest case future price of producing inexperienced hydrogen as the value liquid hydrogen powered ships would pay per kilogram. A lot fallacious with that.

And it’s not like hydrogen refueling stations want one other entry within the debit column. As my evaluation of California’s hydrogen refueling stations from a yr in the past confirmed, of their highest quantity six month, once they’d been operational for years, lemons ought to have been changed and upkeep and operations procedures ought to have been at their peak, that they have been out of service 2,000 extra hours than that they had really been pumping hydrogen. Whereas examine after examine, together with ICCT’s, assumed 4% of capex yearly for operations and upkeep, California’s expertise suggests extra like 30%.

Earlier than digging into the brand new report, a quick nerdy digression. The heating worth of hydrogen tells us how a lot power is launched when it burns, with two varieties: decrease heating worth (LHV) and better heating worth (HHV). LHV measures power with out capturing water vapor’s warmth, assuming it escapes as steam. HHV, nevertheless, consists of this further power, assuming the water cools and condenses. For hydrogen, this distinction issues as a result of LHV aligns higher with gasoline cell effectivity, which doesn’t recuperate the steam’s warmth, making LHV a extra sensible measure for on a regular basis power output comparisons.

The paper defines refueling station effectivity when it comes to total power efficiency by evaluating the power output (the decrease heating worth of the hydrogen allotted and modifications in saved hydrogen) to the station’s whole electrical energy demand. This strategy calculates station effectivity because the ratio of helpful hydrogen power to power consumed by the power, offering perception into operational power expenditure and serving to determine enhancements. The examine included a number of key elements of the hydrogen station: the electrolyzer, which produces hydrogen on-site; storage compressors that pressurize hydrogen for storage; booster compressors for extra strain throughout refueling; the dishing out line, which incorporates hoses and chillers to chill hydrogen to secure ranges earlier than dishing out; and the general web site power programs that provide energy to every of those elements.

This nonetheless isn’t good, as gasoline cells are solely about 50% or 60% environment friendly at turning hydrogen into electrical energy, and therefore ahead movement, however it’s at the least an excellent measure of the effectivity of a full hydrogen refueling station together with stability of plant making its personal hydrogen.

A relatively massive variety of simplistic fashions assume that the effectivity of hydrogen refueling stations making their very own hydrogen can be within the 60% to 70% vary, utilizing simply proton alternate membrane (PEM) effectivity assumptions. Given all of the elements, that’s a foul assumption.

At an effectivity of 60%, a PEM electrolyzer consumes round 55 kWh of electrical energy to provide one kilogram of hydrogen. At 70% effectivity, this requirement drops to about 47 kWh per kilogram. I’ve tended to make use of 55 kWh with stability of plant in my serviette technoeconomic assessments. Nevertheless, that’s turning out to be a foul thought.

The ICCT, in that ill-fated paper various electrical efficiencies, primarily based on the decrease heating worth (LHV), with 2020 ranges at 48 kWh/kg for alkaline, 56 kWh/kg for PEM, and 42 kWh/kg for strong oxide. By 2050, effectivity enhancements are anticipated to achieve 42, 46, and 38 kWh/kg, respectively, for these applied sciences. Word that for PEM, they’re assuming the electrolyser solely efficiencies, indicative of one other drawback with their modeling.

Enter the findings of the brand new examine, Multi-year power efficiency knowledge for an electrolysis-based hydrogen refueling station, by Genovese et al. What did it discover?

In kWh per kilogram, the station’s effectivity different considerably, requiring about 133 kWh/kg of hydrogen at 25% effectivity in 2016, peaking at 222 kWh/kg in 2017 when effectivity fell beneath 15%, and enhancing to 83 kWh/kg by early 2020 as effectivity climbed to 40%.

That’s for the alkaline electrolyser, which the ICCT exhibits as requiring 48 kWh/kg in 2020. The very best case situation, after working for years to enhance effectivity, when volumes of use have been excessive sufficient to eradicate low-usage issues, have been double the kWh/kg that ICCT was utilizing. I’ve reviewed the examine once more simply now and discover no different kWh/kg or effectivity numbers or adders.

As soon as once more, actual world research of precise hydrogen refueling stations which were working for years, which might be seeing pretty constant utilization, which have had unhealthy tools upgraded and that are receiving a number of tender loving care, discover that they’re performing terribly beneath assumed ranges. Just about each report that makes use of accepted efficiencies for hydrogen of their workups for price of of power per kilometer traveled needs to be assumed to be fallacious.