California Public Utilities Fee Crushes Neighborhood Photo voltaic With Newest Monopolistic Play

Join each day information updates from CleanTechnica on e-mail. Or comply with us on Google Information!

California has seen huge progress throughout its solar energy sector — utility-scale photo voltaic, business photo voltaic, and residential photo voltaic have all boomed previously decade plus. Nonetheless, the utilities have been on a mission to squeeze out the little guys (distributed photo voltaic vitality) for years, and after reaching fairly successful on the residential aspect with Internet Metering 3.0, they’ve moved on to limiting progress of group photo voltaic — through their primarily captured regulatory fee, the California Public Utilities Fee (CPUC).

Final week, the CPUC “voted to approve its proposed determination that crushes any likelihood of a scalable group photo voltaic program succeeding in California,” the Photo voltaic Power Industries Affiliation (SEIA) writes.

“Right this moment the CPUC is doing the bidding of monopoly utilities to dam a purposeful group photo voltaic program in California. This determination successfully shuts out the overwhelming majority of low-income Californians, renters, and others that may’t set up photo voltaic straight on their houses from collaborating within the clear vitality financial system,” Stephanie Doyle, California State Affairs Director for SEIA, acknowledged.

“Right this moment’s vote ignores calls from the photo voltaic trade, environmental justice organizations, buyer advocates, and labor teams to create a workable program. It additionally places into query the standing of federal Photo voltaic for All funding, which is solely devoted to increasing photo voltaic accessibility. It is a stunning determination from a Fee that’s charged with defending ratepayers and maintaining electrical energy payments reasonably priced.

I famous above that California has seen huge progress throughout the solar energy sector. Nonetheless, it has truly not been a pacesetter in the neighborhood photo voltaic realm. It has put in simply 163 MW of group photo voltaic, far lower than the two,000 MW put in in New York and even the 1,100 MW put in in little previous Massachusetts. California had an opportunity to lastly catch up and make vital progress on group photo voltaic with a latest vote from the CPUC, however they determined as a substitute to incorporate strict necessities that can restrict new tasks and progress, requiring, for instance, that the prices not exceed the prices of electrical energy the utility might get from one other supply. That takes away the potential for much less prosperous residents of condominium buildings to take part within the photo voltaic vitality revolution, as smaller-scale photo voltaic is solely not as low cost as utility-scale photo voltaic or wind solely taking technology prices into consideration (and ignoring transmission and grid infrastructure prices).

Let’s rewind a bit, although. “The Neighborhood Renewable Power Act (AB 2316) was sponsored by the Coalition for Neighborhood Photo voltaic Entry (CCSA), and supported by the Photo voltaic Industries Power Affiliation, GRID Options, Vote Photo voltaic, the Sierra Membership, and extra. Nonetheless, the CPUC opposed the invoice,” pv journal writes. “The CPUC asserted in its proposed determination that the Internet Worth Billing Tariff (NVBT) outlined within the Neighborhood Renewable Power Act “conflicts with federal regulation and doesn’t meet the necessities” of the invoice, which CCSA has famous is inaccurate.

“In feedback filed in March by CCSA, it characterised the unique proposed determination as misguided and misinformed, and decided it won’t consequence within the improvement of group photo voltaic tasks as envisioned by the legislature with the enactment of AB 2316.

“Now the CPUC has revised its proposed determination and in it concedes that it wants steerage as to what a profitable group photo voltaic program seems like.”

Because it has been authorised by the CPUC, this system depends on subsidies from the EPA’s Photo voltaic for All program. Whereas, advocates need it to depend on the non-public market to be able to make it sustainable and extra fruitful.

Additionally, this system is missing varied essential particulars and steerage — “the revised proposed determination provides no particulars similar to a way for dispersing exterior funding to the tasks and collaborating prospects, reporting necessities, the method for collaborating, eligible tariffs, price restoration mechanisms, and extra.”

It sounds just like the CPUC was pressured to maneuver ahead with one thing, however then gave it a half-hearted try with varied flaws that might cripple California group photo voltaic in its crib.

“The CPUC’s determination primarily advantages the monetary pursuits of utilities and doesn’t assist the State’s local weather targets or the purpose of lowering electrical payments for low-income Californians, which was the aim of AB 2316,” says Aaron Halimi, founder and president of Renewable Properties.

“It’s additionally additional proof that California’s utilities are doing all the things they will to stifle distributed vitality technology to be able to tighten their grip on the state’s electrical energy grid. The vote solidifies California’s place close to the underside of group photo voltaic markets nationwide, ceding management to different states to actually democratize photo voltaic vitality and fulfill nationwide vitality fairness targets,” provides Coalition for Neighborhood Photo voltaic Entry (CCSA).

General, the photo voltaic trade may be very sad with how California has been continuing (i.e., going backward) on solar energy these days. “The CPUC’s latest sequence of choices threatens to unravel California’s clear vitality progress,” SEIA writes. “It’s previous time for Governor Newsom and state leaders to reign within the fee earlier than it inflicts extra harm on prospects and the state’s clear vitality financial system.” It’s onerous to argue in any other case.