22.8 C
New York
Monday, July 1, 2024

CCUS Is Principally An Oil & Fuel Shell Recreation – SFU Seminar Slides & Notes


Join day by day information updates from CleanTechnica on e-mail. Or observe us on Google Information!


Just a few months in the past, Sami Khan, a Simon Fraser College Professor and MIT engineering PhD, reached out to me. He’d learn one thing I’d revealed on ocean geoengineering and wished to know if I used to be taken with speaking together with his PhD, grasp’s diploma, and undergraduate college students concerning the topic, and carbon seize, utilization, and sequestration as a visitor lecturer in a CCUS co-op course he was operating.

I checked to ensure that he knew how bearish I used to be on carbon seize basically, and he did, and wished to show his college students to me regardless. Lately the date arrived and I spent three hours with Khan and his college students. First, a little bit of background on this system.

Khan was one of many first school members of Simon Fraser College’s Sustainable Engineering Program on the Surrey campus and had the chance with early colleagues to form it. It’s a forward-thinking initiative designed to deal with the urgent environmental challenges of our time by way of revolutionary engineering options. Established with a imaginative and prescient to combine sustainability ideas into engineering training, this system focuses on the event of applied sciences and programs that promote environmental stewardship, vitality effectivity, and sustainable growth. College students are geared up with interdisciplinary data and expertise, making ready them to design and implement sustainable engineering practices throughout varied sectors. The curriculum emphasizes hands-on expertise, important considering, and problem-solving, making certain graduates are well-prepared to guide within the transition in the direction of a extra sustainable future.

I’m all the time wanting to spend time with terribly vivid and educated individuals and be challenged by them, however this was one thing extra for me. As I’ve stated many occasions, engineers are a finite useful resource and it’s simple for them to be seduced into doing technically fascinating however finally nugatory work. The engineers engaged on city air mobility, hydrogen transportation, gravity storage that isn’t pumped hydro, and a bunch of different issues could possibly be shifting the needle as a substitute. And carbon seize and storage is among the many largest time and vitality wasters going. I hoped to assist these engineers, who’re simply beginning their careers, choose correctly.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

What’s with the Venn diagram? Effectively, that’s the dimensions of the CO2 within the ambiance proper now, with the dimensions of our historic additions and the dimensions of our annual additions. There are about 3,000 billion tons of CO2 within the ambiance proper now, and we put a 3rd of it there for the reason that starting of the Industrial Revolution by burning fossil fuels.

The invisible dot is our present annual consumption of CO2 as a commodity. The one largest marketplace for CO2 immediately is enhanced oil restoration, over a 3rd of the 230 million tons that any person pays for yearly.

Any purported answer has to begin with the fact that we’re including tens of billions of tons of CO2 a yr to the ambiance, and the whole overage to contemplating drawing down is round 1,000 billion tons. Materiality means one thing that may scale to 1% of the 1,000 billion tons, or 10 billion tons in whole.

An analogy I exploit is attempting to get horses again into the barn after the door has been left open and so they’ve wandered away. Besides there are trillions of horses, they’re microscopically small, they’re invisible, and so they have wings. It’s vastly extra environment friendly to not allow them to escape within the first place.

That implies that options that may obtain 1,000,000 tons a yr or ten million tons are merely immaterial. Even 100 million tons a yr simply isn’t all that. They aren’t related, however as a substitute are a distraction. Who advantages?

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

That results in the issues with mechanical direct air seize, beginning with the sheer quantity of the air that must be moved with the intention to get a ton of carbon dioxide. For sports activities followers, consider the Houston Astrodome, one of many largest sports activities stadiums on the planet, which may maintain as much as 67,000 individuals. It’s big.

The whole factor accommodates only one.1 tons of carbon dioxide in all the air within it. That’s at 100% effectivity of capturing the CO2 out of the air. Trendy DAC applied sciences typically have seize efficiencies starting from 70% to 90%. To get to a non-material million tons a yr, we’d must multiply the Houston Astrodome till it was larger than New York or Tokyo, two of the largest cities on the earth.

100 million tons, moving into sight of materiality, would require 100 of Tokyo’s or New York’s areas coated in Houston Astrodomes. Getting a way of how absurdly huge the ambiance is, and the way little carbon dioxide is in it?

Getting a way of how a lot air needs to be moved simply to have the ability to seize a cloth quantity of CO2?

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

Enter an answer with a wall of followers 2 kilometers lengthy, 20 meters excessive, and three meters deep. That’s adequate to seize 1,000,000 tons of carbon dioxide a yr, which as famous above, is much under the dimensions of materiality.

Have people constructed any machines which are two kilometers lengthy? Probably not. Pipelines, roads, and a few bridges are that lengthy, however they’re principally inert objects with extremely few shifting elements.

The Nice Wall of China is quite a bit longer, nevertheless it simply sits there and it’s solely 6 to 7 meters tall. Zero shifting elements, zero expertise and shorter. If the whole Nice Wall had been was one among these options, it will be thrice taller, a bit thinner, and be capable to seize maybe 12 million tons of CO2 a yr. And 12 million tons doesn’t get to materiality. Oh, and an unlimited variety of shifting elements between the followers, the liquid pumps, the warmth system, and the like.

I assessed this answer 5 years in the past, rebuilding my mind into an affordable imitation of a chemical processing engineer’s. The facsimile and energy was ok to win me a bunch of nerdy, PhD-laden, chemical engineering followers. Not remotely sufficient to make me a chemical processing engineer, however a minimum of they revered the hassle.

The answer makes use of liquid containing potassium hydroxide. When air is pulled into the system, the CO2 reacts with this chemical and will get trapped. Subsequent, it provides one other chemical, calcium hydroxide, which helps launch the trapped CO2 and clear the liquid so it may be used once more. To get the CO2 out, they should warmth the combination to a really excessive temperature, about 900 levels Celsius (1,652 levels Fahrenheit).

The unique peer-reviewed paper for this answer stated it was going to be powered by pure fuel and that a few further carbon seize options had been going to be bolted on to cope with the emissions from burning the fuel. Each ton of CO2 captured from the ambiance was going to create one other 0.5 tons of CO2 from carbon that was beforehand sequestered.

I spotted on the time that the one pure marketplace for this type of expertise was enhanced oil restoration. When 40% of the marketplace for CO2 was enhanced oil restoration, it wasn’t an enormous leap. When US shale oil was additionally leaking monumental quantities of unmarketable, undesirable pure fuel, it actually wasn’t an enormous leap.

The enterprise capital idea of a pure market refers to a enterprise discovering its excellent buyer base naturally, while not having heavy advertising or compelled efforts. On this case, it wasn’t coping with local weather change, it was getting extra oil out of the bottom.

A few months after I revealed that prediction, the agency discovered its first consumer, an oil and fuel main that was going to construct a facility on the Permian Basin to make use of unmarketable pure fuel to energy the system to seize CO2 to pump underground into tapped out oil wells to get extra oil out. After I bumped into one among their engineers at a convention, they let slip that they had been receiving $250 per ton of CO2 that they pumped underground from a few totally different governmental packages.

When a ton of CO2 is pumped underground, it unlocks 1 / 4 to a ton of oil, which when used as directed releases as much as three tons of CO2 into the air. This isn’t remotely a local weather answer. Not that way back, the agency was purchased outright by the oil and fuel main that was its first and sure solely buyer.

That is foreshadowing, a sound and revered literary machine, in case anybody is preserving observe of such issues.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

A agency is exploring mineral weathering as a seashore sand supplementation scheme, one among many thought experiments about spreading finely crushed olivine or different minerals which react with atmospheric CO2 over absurd expanses. Regardless of varied mineral weathering approaches, none have withstood scrutiny when confronted with key questions on sourcing, logistics, effectivity, vitality use, environmental impression, and price. None have been deployed outdoors of tiny trials.

This one focuses on olivine, a standard magnesium iron silicate plentiful within the earth’s crust. When uncovered to the ambiance, olivine reacts with carbon dioxide to type magnesium carbonate. One ton of finely crushed olivine can soak up a ton of CO2. This method, first talked about in a 1990 Nature publication, has not but been commercialized regardless of ongoing tutorial curiosity and enterprise capital funding for associated startups.

The agency goals to mine olivine, grind it into sand, and use it to replenish storm-eroded seashores, hoping to achieve group help over time. Nonetheless, sensible and ecological considerations stay. Olivine’s weathering course of is sluggish, taking about 100 years to achieve 70% efficacy for grains smaller than a millimeter, which is to say, within the vary of sand.

Olivine’s inexperienced hue, whereas distinctive, poses challenges. Communities worth their seashores’ present look and texture, which olivine sand would alter considerably. Financial issues are important. Seaside tourism generates substantial income, and the price of seashore replenishment is usually coated by cobbled-together public funds. In Florida, seashores are very important to the economic system, with one examine I learn suggesting over 50% of Florida’s annual GDP was associated to seashores, and altering their sand composition may scale back their attraction.

There’s a single inexperienced seashore on the earth which is a vacationer attraction — one in Hawaii the place the locals have considerably blockaded the street to it with the intention to extort more cash out of vacationers. Then there are three different seashores, principally in colder elements of the world, which have patches of inexperienced sand. Not precisely seashore meccas.

Widespread adoption of inexperienced seashores is unlikely and the economics are deeply unlikely to work out. The challenge has secured $1.6 million in grants and is in search of Sequence A funding, primarily supported by a group of lecturers learning olivine weathering. Even with optimistic projections, potential carbon drawdown stays a fraction of present annual emissions. As soon as once more, materiality issues.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

In Iceland, a tiny pair of direct air seize services have been constructed close to Reykjavik. The method includes giant followers drawing ambient air into collectors, the place a specifically designed filter materials traps the CO2. As soon as the filter is saturated, the CO2 is remoted by way of a heating course of, releasing it from the filter for subsequent use.

After capturing the carbon dioxide, it’s saved by mixing it with water and injecting it deep into the basaltic rock formations present in Iceland. By a pure mineralization course of, the CO2 reacts with the basalt and solidifies into steady carbonate minerals inside two years, successfully locking it away and stopping it from re-entering the ambiance.

The ability at present captures round 40,000 tons of CO2 yearly, after the ‘huge’ growth. Notice, 1000’s, not even tens of millions, by no means thoughts billions. It is a rounding error on an emaciated gnat’s thorax.

And an costly rounding error. The price of capturing CO2 with this expertise is estimated to be round $600 to $800 per ton. That price isn’t going to go down, as a result of it’s actually primary stuff not amenable to the levers which have pushed down computing energy, wind turbine, battery, and photo voltaic panel price.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

Let’s pivot from the useless finish of air carbon seize to the challenged and wetter finish of oceanic geoengineering and carbon sequestration.

When the ocean absorbs carbon dioxide from the ambiance, a collection of chemical reactions happens, considerably impacting marine ecosystems. Initially, CO2 dissolves in seawater, forming carbonic acid. This acid dissociates into hydrogen ions and bicarbonate ions, and the hydrogen ions can additional react with carbonate ions to type extra bicarbonate. This shift within the carbonate ion to bicarbonate ion stability reduces the supply of carbonate ions, that are essential for shellfish and different marine organisms that depend on them to construct their calcium carbonate shells and skeletons.

The method is known as ocean acidification, reducing the pH of seawater and lowering its alkalinity. This course of not solely threatens the structural integrity of marine life, but in addition diminishes the ocean’s capability to soak up CO2 over time, probably accelerating the speed of local weather change. It’s referred to as oceanic acidification, however actually it’s reducing alkalinity and sucking away mollusk shell constructing blocks.

For a bit extra helpful context, about 90% of the carbon within the ocean is locked up in bicarbonate ions. About 9% is in carbonate ions — those that shellfish want — and about 1% is dissolved CO2. These ratios are essential, as getting CO2 out of ocean water means breaking down the bicarbonate and carbonate ions, and placing extra CO2 into ocean water means lowering the carbonate ions.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

A totally different agency tried to make use of magnesium hydroxide, generally known as milk of magnesia and used as an antacid. When launched into seawater, magnesium hydroxide bonds with the carbonic acid from absorbed CO2, forming magnesium carbonate and water, thus stopping carbonate ions from being was bicarbonate ions and decreased ocean alkalinity. This retains ocean alkalinity steady and doesn’t eat up the carbonate ions shellfish want for his or her shells.

Nonetheless, the approach doesn’t immediately take away atmospheric carbon dioxide. Maintaining ocean alkalinity from declining retains the ocean’s skill to soak up CO2 up, round a bunch of different components that impression absorption, with a biggie being temperature.

The agency secured important funding, together with grants and the distinguished $1-million, Musk-backed CDR XPRIZE. A part of that’s as a result of that they had a California PhD who has been publishing about this for many years as their scientific officer. With the cash, they constructed two pilot crops which they function.

It’s outstanding that they bought some huge cash, awards, and pilot crops due to some primary stuff it took me about 25 minutes to determine from scratch after listening to concerning the expertise.

The primary huge one was that the method of producing magnesium hydroxide carries a carbon debt higher than the oceanic carbon drawdown enchancment. There isn’t any local weather win when the uncooked supplies required have an enormous carbon debt. Full lifecycle carbon accounting is required for any answer, and this one fails that sniff check.

The second huge one is that the uncooked materials, magnesium hydroxide, is pricey. We’ve been manufacturing it for hundreds of years and are doing it as cheaply because it’s ever going to be carried out. The tip to finish prices, even when there was web carbon drawdown, would have been lots of of {dollars} per ton.

The third is that we don’t actually have deal with on what lots of magnesium carbonate would do in ecosystems. It’s assumed to be comparatively benign, however that’s totally different than being confirmed to be benign.

All three of those are trivial to find out from public knowledge sources immediately, and analysis within the Nineties established the info. This has clearly been a useless finish for approaching 30 years, but lecturers and now this agency have tried to implement it, and run full pace into the brick wall of the fact.

The carbon debt and financial failures of the method imply that after profitable prizes, getting funding, and constructing pilot crops with its proposed answer, the agency is pivoting to exploring using mining waste to supply alkaline substances to dump into the ocean as a substitute. That manner lies much more crimson flags.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

A California-based carbon seize firm has raised over $33 million to seize CO2 from seawater. Its technique includes pumping seawater, splitting a bit off to make it rather more acidic with electrolysis and a proprietary membrane, then combining it again into the primary stream. This dissolves the carbonate ions and bicarbonate ions, turning them into CO2. They bubble the CO2 out of the water with normal vacuum fuel separation methods, then rebalance the alkalinity of the water earlier than returning it to the ocean.

Sharp eyes can have observed the bit about turning carbonate ions into CO2 and eradicating them from the seawater. Sure, this course of would take away shellfish-essential substances from the seawater. It is a native course of, so may be managed the place there’s a sturdy aspect present bringing new ocean water previous the power each hour and no down-current shellfish life to talk of.

One other difficulty lies in seawater’s complexity. Wealthy in life, salts, and minerals, seawater could cause speedy fouling of the system’s proprietary membranes, that are each costly and difficult to take care of. Moreover, the method of extracting carbon dioxide from seawater is energy-intensive and inefficient. The agency would wish to course of billions of tons of seawater yearly to seize a million tons of CO2.

Simply elevating that a lot heavy seawater the seemingly 5 meters can be energetically costly, by no means thoughts the vitality for the method itself. Additionally they must do one thing with the CO2 itself, and extra on that later. The vitality required for this course of — tens of GWh yearly — can be higher utilized in powering houses, electrical automobiles, and industrial operations, considerably lowering emissions extra immediately.

And simply to drive the nail house, the largest drawback with ocean acidification is eradicating the substances shellfish want, and this doesn’t clear up that.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

One other startup’s course of includes capturing CO2 from an exterior supply and mixing it with seawater. It makes use of electrical energy to change the seawater’s electrochemistry, accelerating the conversion of CO2 to carbonic acid, which then reacts to type bicarbonate ions whereas depleting carbonate ions. This handled water, now heavy with bicarbonate ions, is returned to the ocean.

The pilot plant in Singapore will sequester 100 kilograms of CO2 day by day in seawater, and produce low-carbon hydrogen if powered by inexperienced electrical energy. The plant’s course of is basically hydrogen electrolysis, which may produce 300 kilograms of hydrogen by mixing CO2 with seawater. Their current paper signifies they’ll sequester about 4.6 kilograms of CO2 per cubic meter of seawater, which means sequestering a ton of CO2 would require round 217 tons of seawater. The CO2 needs to be pure, in fact, in any other case problems of each chemistry and ocean biology come up.

In fact, what they’re doing is electrolysis of salty water, which is the chlor-alkali course of which makes chlorine, a lethal toxic fuel. How they get round that isn’t described. Regardless, the method depletes the carbonate ions essential for shellfish.

Do they point out shellfish of their literature? Do they point out chlorine and its risks to people and aquatic life? Have they got a biologist on employees? No, no, and no.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

Talking of pure CO2, let’s speak about Satartia, Mississippi. It’s a tiny village of 41 residents in western Mississippi. In 2020, a CO2 pipeline 1.6 kilometers away that transported the fuel to an enhanced oil restoration facility — there’s that phrase once more — breached due to a minor landslide.

No huge deal, you suppose, CO2 is a fuel and it’ll simply disperse. Not so quick. A number of CO2 pipelines use liquid section CO2 as a result of it’s quite a bit simpler to pump an incompressible and far denser fluid than a compressible and rather more voluminous fuel. That’s what was within the Satartia pipeline, liquid CO2. When the pipeline burst, the liquid turned quickly right into a fuel, about 590 occasions the quantity because the liquid.

No huge deal, you suppose, the ensuing CO2 is a fuel and it’ll simply disperse. Not so quick, but once more. CO2 is heavier than the nitrogen and oxygen in our ambiance, and so it would roll downhill in a thick blanket and settle into depressions, dispersing solely after hours. Consider dry ice machines, which use frozen CO2 to create a layer of fog alongside dance flooring or in sporting occasions.

The pipeline was uphill from Satartia.

The blanket of CO2, meters or tens of meters thick, rolled downhill, throughout an intervening freeway the place it left individuals who had pulled their automobiles right into a relaxation cease unconscious and thrashing. It rolled over Satartia, the place it left everybody on the town unconscious and thrashing on the bottom or of their houses. They noticed it coming, because it was tinted a bit by the presence of hint parts of hydrogen sulfide, the toxic fuel that smells like rotten eggs, however in too small quantities to be dangerous.

So why was everybody left unconscious and thrashing? Why didn’t they simply drive away? People can’t breathe an excessive amount of CO2. In quantities as little as a thousand elements per million, minor cognitive impairment begins to be detectable. At 2,500 elements per million, we’re decreased to the mental capacities of kindergarten youngsters. At 30,000 elements per million, we’re at rapid and critical well being threat. And inner combustion automobiles don’t work with out oxygen both. Folks’s automobiles wouldn’t begin and emergency responders couldn’t get into the world. A few hundred individuals had been evacuated and 46 hospitalized.

Hours later, CO2 at ranges of 30,000 elements per million had been nonetheless current in some rooms in buildings within the village.

What does this must do with carbon seize basically?

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

Earlier this yr, I put this graphic collectively as a part of a dialogue associated to CO2 pipeline security considerations. I took a inhabitants density map of Europe and one of many proposed CO2 pipeline, terminal, and sequestration maps from an EU doc associated to carbon sequestration, and overlaid them.

What you see as you have a look at the map is that we make lots of carbon dioxide from varied processes the place there are lots of people. Europe is nearly fully extra densely populated than western Mississippi. CO2 pipelines immediately are virtually fully for enhanced oil restoration within the southern United States, in areas which are sparsely populated.

Any local weather technique that depends to any important extent on carbon seize and sequestration can have lots of CO2 pipelines operating by way of densely populated areas. The protection considerations are apparent.

There are mitigations, however all they do is make the answer fairly a bit dearer than claimed. All pipelines by way of even reasonably populated areas must be fuel section. They’ll be a lot larger and therefore dearer for a similar mass of CO2 traversing them. They’ll require part shut-offs in all probability each kilometer to restrict the releases of CO2. They’ll have fairly costly legal responsibility insurance coverage.

Even then, in terms of native acceptance of CO2 pipelines, Satartia will come up time and again and once more, resulting in huge opposition to them. Not in my yard, would be the fairly cheap cry.

Why is NIMBY cheap on this case and never others? As a result of considerations about wind generators, transmission traces, and photo voltaic farms are overblown nonsense, whereas considerations about huge CO2 leaks are fairly actual. As a result of wind generators, transmission traces, and photo voltaic farms cease carbon dioxide from being emitted vastly extra cheaply than attempting to place all of these trillions of invisible flying horses again into the barn.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

Equinor’s Sleipner facility is usually touted as a whole success story for carbon sequestration, placing tens of millions of tons a yr into long run sequestration underneath the North Sea.

That’s as huge a fantasy because the identify, which comes from Norse mythology. It was Odin’s creepy eight-legged spider horse that Loki bore after remodeling right into a mare and seducing the horse of a grasp builder who was erecting Asgard’s partitions as a part of some crafty plan.

Why is it as huge a fantasy? As a result of all the power does is take pure fuel with too excessive a ratio of CO2 out from underneath the North Sea, strip off the CO2, and put it again underneath the ocean mattress. When the pure fuel is used as supposed, burning it releases about 25 occasions as a lot CO2 as was sequestered. Sleipner eliminates about 4% of the CO2 emissions from the power. That’s not an enormous win, that’s a tiny enchancment.

To be clear, Norway is a pacesetter in making certain that methane doesn’t leak from its services, in contrast to the USA, which is a worldwide chief in leaking methane. And the Sleipner facility is the most cost effective carbon dioxide sequestration facility from a capital and working price on the earth, principally as a result of a lot of it was required simply to get the pure fuel out.

Why does Equinor do that virtuous act? As a result of the federal government pays iit to. Final time I estimated it, the corporate had acquired over a billion {dollars} for not utilizing the ambiance as an open sewer.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

Are there every other fossil gas majors that are asserting sequestration advantage that doesn’t maintain as much as scrutiny? Definitely, ExxonMobil, well-known for its inner scientists realizing that local weather change was actual, critical, and attributable to Exxon, telling administration that, and Exxon then muzzling the scientists and funding international local weather denial and disinformation campaigns.

It claims to have the very best CO2 sequestration facility on the earth with its Shute Creek website within the USA. What does that website do? It extracts pure fuel with an excessive amount of CO2 (sound acquainted?), strips off the CO2, after which places it in a pipeline to be transported to close by oil fields, the place it’s used for enhanced oil restoration. That’s, when the oil corporations are keen to pay for the CO2. In any other case they simply vent it to the ambiance. And, in fact, each ton of CO2 utilized in enhanced oil restoration normally leads to much more CO2 from the oil that comes up resulting from its use, and all of that pure fuel each leaks and turns into CO2 when used.

There’s nothing virtuous about ExxonMobil’s ‘management’ in CCS. It’s a shell recreation.

Lately Canada handed Invoice C-59, which requires corporations selling sustainability claims to be each factual and to have the ability to again up their claims with third social gathering validation. Naturally the oil and fuel trade took this as a frontal assault. Additionally naturally, all three main fossil gas propaganda and lobbying teams took all of their sustainability claims off of social media and the online. That meant eradicating all of their media bulletins as properly. Why did they really feel the necessity to do that? As a result of their claims had been specious nonsense, they knew it, they knew that they couldn’t defend them, and Invoice C-59 has tooth with 3% of income to a $15 million cap per offense. That would flip into huge cash in a short time.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

What concerning the thought of bolting carbon seize onto fossil gas electrical technology crops? Effectively, that’s been tried too. In Saskatchewan, the utility added carbon seize expertise to the Boundary Dam coal plant. It operated for a handful of years. The outcomes?

Very costly wholesale prices of electrical energy, about $140 per MWh, far above wind and photo voltaic firmed by transmission and storage. That’s even with the inevitable enhanced oil restoration with the captured CO2.

The utility is on file as saying that it’s by no means going to think about that once more.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

Maybe it’s an outlier? No.

The Petra Nova coal plant within the southern USA added a carbon seize rig to one among eight boilers on the facility. Then they added a pure fuel cogeneration plant to supply the electrical energy and warmth for the carbon seize course of. It required 15% to twenty% of the vitality generated by the coal plant to separate the CO2 out of the flue fuel, clear it up, and compress it.

The plant managed to stand up to 92% seize charges when the requirement is far nearer to 100%, and CCS advocates claimed victory. As a way to method 100%, one other carbon seize expertise fully can be required to course of the output of the primary carbon seize expertise, so issues would simply get extra energetically nonsensical. In fact, the methane-powered cogen plant was utilizing what methane arrived at it and didn’t leak, and had methane slippage of its personal. Additional, the CO2 from the cogen plant was not captured both. The 92% is much worse than that in actuality when the complete end-to-end CO2e emissions are thought-about.

This was very costly as properly, a few billion {dollars}, even with governmental grants, tax breaks, and a few income from enhanced oil restoration. The Petra Nova facility is conspicuously not increasing the carbon seize program to the opposite boilers.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

Just a few years in the past, I checked out all the CCS websites on the earth claiming to sequester 1,000,000 or extra tons of CO2 a yr. I used the International CCS Institute’s public knowledge for this. What’s the GCCSI? It’s a lobbying and propaganda group funded by the oil and fuel trade.

Unsurprisingly, the info set was lacking lots of related knowledge. It had the location, the placement, and the claimed annual sequestration. It didn’t have the capital prices, working prices, the place the CO2 was coming from, or whether or not the CO2 was used for enhanced oil restoration.

I went out and located all of that knowledge from different public websites to assemble a strong sufficient knowledge set. I initially made the beneficiant assumption that every one CO2 was captured, and so solely adjusted claimed sequestration for enhanced oil restoration, for which I made the beneficiant assumption of low enhanced oil restoration.

The initiatives went again to the Nineteen Seventies, so I made up my mind how a lot cash had been spent every decade. Then I requested the easy query about how a lot carbon avoidance that cash may have purchased if it had been spent on wind and photo voltaic as a substitute. In any case, every MWh of renewably generated electrical energy pushes a MWh of fossil gas generated electrical energy off of the grid, keep away from the emissions from it. I adjusted technology for historic capability components as properly.

With all of those advantages of the doubt, the cash spent on CCS would have averted thrice as a lot CO2 as was sequestered by these services over their lifetime to the date of my evaluation.

And, in fact, because the case research present the bulk case is definitely CO2 that was already sequestered being pumped up from underground and put again once more for enhanced oil restoration or federal tax breaks. When the CO2 was beforehand sequestered, claiming advantage in extracting and re-sequestering it’s like strolling as much as a rubbish can on the road, kicking it over, then righting it and refilling it and demanding to be recommended to your civic advantage.

Slide from Surrey Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from Surrey Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

There are locations the place carbon seize will find yourself penciling out because the optimum selection, however they’re few and much between. One of many nice hopes is for hydrogen. That is the latest iteration of my demand projection by way of 2100 for hydrogen.

One factor to recollect is that hydrogen is a greenhouse fuel emissions drawback on the dimensions of all aviation globally proper now, over a billion tons of CO2e yearly. That this big local weather drawback is being touted as a local weather answer is a little bit of a head-scratcher.

Even the dimmest eyes will be aware that I challenge that demand goes down, not up. That’s as a result of I’ve checked out all the present and purported demand sectors for hydrogen and have sense which course they’re heading. Floor transportation is simply going to affect, and that’s an enormous demand space for fossil fuels immediately. Electrical technology goes to be renewables, transmission and batteries, with hydrogen being an costly and lossy loser within the competitors. Biofuels are utterly match for goal for the elements of aviation and maritime transport that received’t electrify and can nonetheless persist. In any case, 40% of bulk transport is of fossil fuels as cargo, and that’s going manner.

Additional, the largest present demand section for hydrogen immediately is from oil refineries. It’s used to take impurities, particularly sulfur, out of crude oil, and to crack it into lighter and heavier fractions. The heavier and better sulfur the crude oil, the extra hydrogen is required. I estimate that 7.7 kilograms is required for a barrel of Alberta’s crude oil. That hydrogen needs to be decarbonized to decarbonize oil and fuel manufacturing, so it’s going to be blue or inexperienced hydrogen, each of that are dearer.

That implies that the standard low cost for Alberta’s and Venezuela’s merchandise are going to go up simply as oil demand is flattening and declining with peak oil. The world can be awash in mild, low-sulfur oil, so heavy, high-sulfur oils received’t be economically aggressive. That implies that refinery demand for hydrogen will plummet a lot quicker than oil refining will decline.

In different phrases, blue hydrogen can be utilized in refineries, nevertheless it has a brief demand lifespan. Consequently, the associated CCS can be restricted too. There can be some, and it is going to be pretty low cost as refineries are usually in-built oil nation the place there are the talents, expertise, corporations, tools and geological traits to help carbon sequestration comparatively inexpensively.

The remainder of demand will principally be met with inexperienced hydrogen, the place carbon seize and sequestration are pointless.

Slide from Surrey Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from Surrey Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

I just lately accomplished my end-to-end evaluation of cement, concrete, and all of the purported options, in addition to one among my common projections of demand and profitable options by way of 2100. For years I’ve been asserting that one of many few locations the place blue hydrogen and its associated carbon seize and sequestration may pencil out is on cement crops.

The issue is course of emissions from decomposing limestone into lime — the first part of cement — and carbon dioxide, which traditionally has been a conveniently odorless invisible waste product that disposes of itself. We will electrify limestone kilns, however so long as we’re turning limestone into lime, we’re going to get the CO2 as a part of the discount.

In my evaluation, I labored out the cost-adders over primary unabated cement and concrete for varied options. The place electrified warmth or an answer like Chic System’s electrochemical course of is used to decompose limestone, capturing the pretty pure CO2 waste stream is less expensive. The place cement crops coincidentally sit subsequent to good geological sequestration websites, eliminating the CO2 can be low cost. The place that mixture may be made to work, it is perhaps cheaper to do this than the options.

However nonetheless, I solely given CCS about half a century of relevance within the answer area.

One of many largest levers for cement emissions, engineered timber, could be very fascinating in discussions of CCS. Engineering timber is principally plywood. It may be made into structural beams, partitions and flooring, changing bolstered concrete. As a result of it’s stronger, one ton of engineered timber replaces 4.8 tons of bolstered concrete. As a result of it’s lighter, foundations require quite a bit much less bolstered concrete.

It’s already a lot decrease carbon emissions full lifecycle, from forest to constructing, than bolstered concrete, 200 to 300 kg of CO2e per ton of engineered timber. These lifecycle emissions are from extraction, transport and milling with fossil gas powered machines and fossil gas technology of electrical energy. These emissions are going away.

And engineered timber is manufactured from wooden. Each ton of wooden has breathed in a few ton of atmospheric carbon dioxide and breathed out all the oxygen. The carbon is sequestered. Placing it right into a constructing sequesters it for 60 to 100  years. When the constructing is demolished, helpful beams and panels may be reused. The remainder can have the carbon sequestered completely by way of one among a number of approaches, from thermolysis to create biocrude and biochar which may be unfold in forests to return vitamins, to sinking it within the ocean’s depths.

At current we harvest within the low billions of tons of timber, turning lots of it into single use paper merchandise and lots of it into warmth for varied causes. Diverting these wasteful choices into a lot larger benefit engineered timber implies that monumental tons of it could possibly be made obtainable from present forestry packages. And forestry can simply be sustainable.

Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard
Slide from SFU Sustainable Engineering Seminar by Michael Barnard

The organic pathway for engineered timber has two carbon advantages. The primary is that it avoids all the CO2 from bolstered concrete, an enormous win. As a result of one ton of it displaces 4.8 tons of engineered concrete, that’s lots of averted CO2. However then it’s a sequestration pathway for atmospheric CO2 as properly.

Timber develop themselves if we allow them to. So do crops. Nature naturally sequesters CO2. The glomalin protein on mycelium roots in undisturbed soil pushes carbon atoms successfully into long run soil seize. If we cease disturbing the soil, and we’ll by way of low-tillage farming and rewilding, the CO2 can be drawn down.

Enhancing pure carbon sinks is vastly cheaper and simpler than carbon seize and sequestration. It simply doesn’t profit the fossil gas trade. That’s why the nations pushing CCS arduous are those that extract, course of, refine, distribute and promote lots of fossil fuels from their lands and beneath their waters.

International locations that don’t have huge fossil gas reserves — most of them — are sensibly following methods targeted on nature-based options. They received’t assist us get to zero by 2050, however neither will mechanical or industrial CCS, and the nature-based options will deal with the issues of the following hundred years and the centuries after that.


Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Wish to promote? Wish to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Speak podcast? Contact us right here.


Newest CleanTechnica.TV Movies

Commercial



 


CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage right here.




Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

Verified by MonsterInsights