5.5 C
New York
Friday, November 15, 2024

‘Covid’ whistleblower Lesley Roberts believes this one medical blunder value hundreds of lives. A latest story that deserves higher circulation – David Icke


Whistleblowing nurse Lesley Roberts has highlighted one devastating blunder that she believes led to hundreds of avoidable deaths in the course of the Covid pandemic.

She is talking out after receiving a “Restriction Order” from the Scottish Covid Inquiry that will stop her from disclosing any of the proof or paperwork she has submitted to the probe. Ms Roberts says she fears the influence can be to cease her and different campaigners from criticising the Scottish Authorities.

Ms Roberts, who was an an infection management hyperlink nurse with NHS Higher Glasgow and Clyde in the beginning of pandemic in addition to a office well being and security rep for Unison, has been an outspoken critic of the selections taken by ministers and healthcare officers on the time.

She has reported the Scottish Authorities to Police Scotland and is looking for Nicola Sturgeon and Jeane Freeman to face company murder prices. She has repeatedly highlighted the elevated use of Do Not Resuscitate varieties, particularly round aged or susceptible sufferers with Covid-19.

Now – with the specter of a ‘gagging order’ looming from the inquiry – she needs to debate what she sees as probably the most explosive a part of the huge array of proof she has gathered over the previous three years.

It pertains to the NG163 ‘finish of life’ protocol from NICE, the Nationwide Institute for Well being and Care Excellence. It was issued to medical doctors and nurses throughout the UK on April 3, 2020 and remained in place till March 21, 2021.

In response to Ms Roberts and different healthcare campaigners, NG163 primarily informed medics to prescribe a lethal cocktail of highly effective medication to individuals in hospital and elsewhere who had been recognized with a complicated case of Covid-19.

She stated: “It ought to by no means have been thought of. Individuals who weren’t on the finish of their lives had been dropped at the tip due to these medication. If they’d respiration difficulties then their respiration was being suppressed even additional by the medication and it was this that then killed them, not Covid.”

Similar to the catastrophic determination to maneuver aged sufferers from hospitals to care properties, both with out testing or generally even after they’d examined optimistic for coronavirus, NG163 was controversial proper from the beginning.

‘There may be potential danger of unintended severe hurt’
On April 20, 2020, 11 of the UK’s most senior consultants in palliative care drugs – together with Barry Laird, from the College of Edinburgh and St Columba’s Hospice – wrote to the British Medical Journal to flag their issues.

They stated: “We totally perceive why shortcuts to the traditional NICE guideline process had been essential, in an effort to produce Covid-19 steering quickly. However we’re involved that uncritical use of NG163 could create unintended dangers for individuals with suspected or precise Covid-19 an infection.”

The steering was primarily based on earlier NICE recommendation “aimed toward care of people that had been prone to die within the coming hours and days”. They added: “Many individuals within the UK who’re suspected of getting Covid-19 won’t have superior most cancers or be dying from one other present terminal situation.”

Learn Extra: The demise protocol


The Dream



Related Articles

Latest Articles

Verified by MonsterInsights