Studying Time: 2 minutes
In a latest case involving Leo Fasteners, an organization engaged in wind energy technology in Tamil Nadu, India, the Nationwide State Load Dispatch Centre (NLDC) confronted a petition for the comfort of cut-off dates and the issuance of Renewable Vitality Certificates (RECs). The petitioner sought to condone the delay in making use of for RECs protecting power injected from December 2020 to August 2021.
The problem arose as a result of the petitioner had an present petition, pending with the Fee, requesting condonation of delay for the interval from November 2019 to November 2020. Resulting from this, they avoided making use of for RECs for the next interval, assuming it was barred.
The COVID-19 pandemic additional sophisticated issues, inflicting delays within the software course of. The lockdown hindered bodily motion and acquiring obligatory documentation from the State Load Dispatch Heart (SLDC).
The Supreme Court docket of India, nonetheless, had clarified that the interval from March 15, 2020, to Could 31, 2022, was to be excluded in calculating the interval of limitation for authorized proceedings, which included the petitioner’s case.
Throughout the listening to on April 24, 2023, the petitioner’s counsel argued that the delay was unintentional. The NLDC expressed no objections to the petitioner’s requests. Consequently, the Fee reserved the petition for orders.
The Fee acknowledged the procedural nature of the delay and its origins within the pandemic and the petitioner’s misunderstanding of the earlier petition. The core goal of the REC Rules is to advertise renewable power technology.
Therefore, the Fee exercised its authority to offer leniency, permitting for the achievement of the rules’ targets. This entailed accommodating the delay by stress-free particular procedural necessities within the REC procedures.
The Fee directed the NLDC to problem the RECs after due verification, guaranteeing that each one mission circumstances had been met and all obligatory paperwork had been submitted.
The Fee emphasised that whereas that they had granted this reduction, the petitioner ought to adhere to timelines sooner or later, as compliance with the REC Rules and Detailed Process stays a prerequisite for REC issuance. In conclusion, the Fee addressed the petitioner’s request by condoning the delay and stress-free the cut-off dates, emphasizing the significance of adherence to the REC Rules in future purposes.
Please learn the doc beneath for extra particulars.
