Round one-third of all meals produced goes to waste, producing climate-warming greenhouse gases because it rots.
New analysis, revealed in Environmental Analysis Letters, finds that poorly temperature-controlled meals provide chains might be inflicting as much as 620m tonnes of meals losses every year.
This loss ends in 1.8 billion tonnes of CO2-equivalent (GtCO2e) emissions – greater than thrice the annual emissions of Canada.
Utilizing extra refrigeration when meals is processed and transported may greater than halve the food-loss emissions in South and Southeast Asia, the examine says.
As well as, shortening meals provide chains may considerably scale back emissions and forestall meals loss around the globe, the examine finds.
A scientist who was not concerned within the analysis tells Carbon Temporary that the outcomes “replicate a worrying actuality” on meals waste, however notes that the findings are “unsure”.
The lead creator of the examine says that there are caveats to among the findings and provides that not each area can, or ought to, base their meals provide system on refrigeration.
“
If a area doesn’t have steady power infrastructure, then the concept of basing a meals system off of refrigeration is definitely perhaps much less sustainable when it comes to meals loss and waste than what they at present have.
Aaron Friedman-Heiman, researcher, College of Michigan
Wasted meals
Alongside a provide chain that sees meals grown, processed, transported and consumed, round one-third of all meals goes to waste.
If it had been a rustic, this meals waste could be the third-largest supply of greenhouse fuel emissions on the earth, in accordance to the UN Meals and Agriculture Group.
A 2023 examine additionally discovered that greenhouse gases from meals loss and waste make up nearly half of all food-system emissions.
Meals loss refers to the entire edible components of meals which can be thrown away within the early components of the availability chain, in line with a report from the UN Surroundings Programme.
This consists of greens that rot in fields earlier than being picked, crops hit by illness and meat that spoils attributable to lack of transport refrigeration.
Meals waste, alternatively, is discarded meals that’s not consumed by individuals at a retail, meals service or family stage.
Meals loss and waste produces methane because it rots in landfills or dump websites. Emissions from meals loss additionally stem from the land-use change, power and sources required to develop the meals within the first place, significantly animal merchandise.
The brand new examine examines whether or not extra constant entry to refrigeration all through the availability chain may impression meals loss – and the ensuing greenhouse fuel emissions – for various meals varieties around the globe.
Alongside the advantages of refrigeration, the examine finds that supplying meals extra domestically can enormously scale back meals losses.
This was probably the most stunning discovering, in line with Aaron Friedman-Heiman, the lead creator of the examine. Friedman-Heiman, a latest graduate from the varsity for setting and sustainability on the College of Michigan, tells Carbon Temporary:
“The factor that shocked me probably the most was really how comparable shortened meals provide chains had been to technologically optimised meals provide chains.
“We are able to make all these methods actually environment friendly, but additionally if we simply eliminate quite a lot of the steps, that’s one other sort of method of optimising these methods.”
Prof Ian Vázquez-Rowe, an engineering professor on the Pontifical Catholic College of Peru who was not concerned within the analysis, says that the examine is “thorough” and related, “particularly in nations and households with poor refrigeration methods”. He tells Carbon Temporary:
“The outcomes are in all probability fairly unsure, as in most planetary-based estimations, however they replicate a worrying actuality: meals provide chains are inefficient, particularly in rising and creating nations, and this results in greater quantities of meals loss and waste within the agri-food sector.”
Estimating meals loss
The researchers developed a mannequin to see whether or not constant entry to refrigeration may impression meals losses and greenhouse fuel emissions for seven teams of meals: seafood; fruit and vegetable; oilseeds and pulses; root and tuber crops; meat; dairy; and cereals.
The examine focuses solely on meals that’s misplaced between harvesting and reaching a grocery store shelf. It doesn’t have a look at meals waste, which is the meals discarded in outlets, eating places and households.
The researchers have a look at the enhancements that might happen with higher refrigeration all through the meals provide chain. In addition they have a look at the impression of constructing meals extra domestically accessible, thereby shortening these provide chains.
The examine focuses on seven areas around the globe: Europe, “industrialised Asia” (nations corresponding to China), Latin America, north Africa and central Asia, North America and Oceania, south and south-east Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.
For every mixture of area and meals kind, the researchers examine three situations: a “baseline” state of affairs, utilizing present loss charges; an “optimised” state of affairs, utilizing minimal loss charges with added refrigeration capability; and a “quick” state of affairs, utilizing present loss charges throughout a diminished provide chain.
The chart beneath outlines the baseline and optimised situations for meals loss and the ensuing greenhouse fuel emissions. It exhibits that though fruit and vegetable losses are largest when it comes to weight, meat losses are the supply of the most important emissions by far.
International meals loss in tens of millions of kilograms (prime) and the ensuing greenhouse fuel emissions in tens of millions of kilograms of CO2e (backside) modelled in two situations: present (lighter block) and higher refrigerated (darker block) meals provide chains. The examine focuses on seven meals teams: meat (gray), milk (yellow), fish and seafood (blue), fruit and veggies (inexperienced), cereals (orange), roots and tubers (purple), and oilseeds and pulses (brown). Supply: Friedman-Heiman & Miller (2024)
Combining refrigeration and shorter provide chains
Sub-Saharan Africa and South and Southeast Asia would stand to see the largest reductions in meals loss and associated greenhouse fuel emissions with higher refrigeration and localised provide chains, the examine finds.
For instance, improved refrigeration may save greater than 100m tonnes of fruit and greens every year in south and south-east Asia. It may additionally scale back general meals loss within the area by 45 per cent and greater than halve the related emissions. In sub-Saharan Africa, it may minimize these emissions by two-thirds.
Globally, higher refrigeration of meat may minimize emissions linked to meat loss by greater than 40 per cent.
Meat accounts for greater than half (2.7 gigatonnes) of meals loss and waste greenhouse fuel emissions – regardless of making up lower than 10 per cent of worldwide meals loss and waste, the examine says.
The advantages of refrigeration in decreasing meals loss are extra modest in international north nations with current temperature-controlled meals provide chains.
The examine finds that, on a worldwide stage, making meals provide chains extra native can have a much bigger impression on saving meals than enhancing refrigeration.
Localised provide chains may scale back emissions from rotting meat in industrialised nations by greater than 300m tonnes of CO2e emissions every year, the examine provides.
Combining the 2 options – shorter provide chains and higher refrigeration – may also help to cut back meals losses and slash the power burden and emissions from refrigeration.
Different components
Vázquez-Rowe says that the examine findings are “believable” and that they “replicate a structural drawback of meals methods”. However, he provides:
“There’s a lack of uncertainty and sensitivity analyses, which doesn’t permit for a full evaluation of the knowledge of the outcomes they supply.”
The authors acknowledge different limitations within the examine, corresponding to not contemplating the emissions from fridges of their calculations.
Earlier analysis signifies that refrigeration might even enhance meals emissions by greater power use and the dietary shifts that refrigeration permits.
The examine additionally doesn’t contemplate numerous social, cultural, political, dietary and financial components that affect meals methods.
Areas with unreliable power methods might not wish to – or might not have the ability to – rely extra closely on refrigeration applied sciences. Friedman-Heiman explains:
“If a area doesn’t have steady power infrastructure, then the concept of basing a meals system off of refrigeration is definitely perhaps much less sustainable when it comes to meals loss and waste than what they at present have.”
He’s hopeful researchers, policymakers and others within the meals business can use the mannequin and additional the analysis on a wider stage. He tells Carbon Temporary:
“I might love for this mannequin to include regional power grids and what that impression could be when it comes to altering the emissions equation…[alongside] pitting the meals financial savings towards the refrigeration [emissions].”
The examine additionally acknowledges that shorter provide chains are usually not all the time possible, relying on geographical location and the seasonality of various meals.
This story was revealed with permission from Carbon Temporary.
