The worldwide deal for biodiversity agreed in Montreal in December 2022 was hailed as historic. Governments dedicated to guard and restore ecosystems, slash air pollution from plastics and chemical compounds, and enhance pure options to local weather change.
However the world has been right here earlier than. Two earlier offers agreed in 2002 and 2010 didn’t reside as much as expectations. Within the meantime, biodiversity loss has spiralled – wildlife populations have declined globally by 69 per cent on common since 1970, and the speed of loss is accelerating.
The UN’s Conference on Organic Variety (CBD) is hoping to construct momentum and velocity up implementation of the Kunming-Montreal World Biodiversity Framework at its subsequent spherical of talks. COP16 kicks off on 21 October within the Colombian metropolis of Cali, with Astrid Schomaker on the helm for her first main talks as govt secretary.
Appointed in April, Schomaker is not any stranger to multilateral negotiations, having labored on the European Fee since 1992, and within the setting division since 2004. Her most up-to-date roles included director for inexperienced diplomacy and multilateralism, and director for world sustainable growth, and she or he has headed up items on points together with marine setting and water, and chemical compounds and nanomaterials. She holds a legislation diploma and a grasp’s diploma in worldwide authorized cooperation.
“COP16 is the primary alternative to display that the framework isn’t just a few good phrases, however that international locations are actually taking motion,” says Schomaker. “The very first thing that issues is to display alignment between motion and political dedication.”
“
The synergy debate has by no means been as energetic as it’s this yr – there may be now a globally recognised narrative that the local weather, biodiversity, and land degradation crises are components of 1 disaster.
Astrid Schomaker, govt secretary, Conference on Organic Variety
By the point talks start, governments are anticipated to have submitted nationwide motion plans (often called Nationwide Biodiversity Methods and Motion Plans or NBSAPs) detailing how they intend to fulfill the worldwide targets agreed in Montreal. The CBD can be permitting them to submit targets in the event that they haven’t been capable of full their full motion plans in time.
To this point, governments have made extra progress on targets, with greater than 1,500 from 72 international locations submitted to the CBD, in contrast with simply 25 international locations which have submitted NBSAPs.
Whereas these are within the technique of being scrutinised, all Schomaker can say is: “It’s clear there are some points which are simpler than others for governments.” The CBD will publish an evaluation of the plans forward of COP.
The finance hole
COP’s agenda will embody options to closing the US$700 billion annual hole in finance wanted for nature, resembling a brand new fund for sharing the advantages of genetic assets and reforming subsidies that hurt nature. Nations can even have to agree on monitor and measure their progress.
On the time of talking, per week of technical talks on sharing the advantages of genetic assets and digital sequencing had simply concluded. The talks had been aiming to appropriate historic injustices referring to the possession and management of genetic assets, conventional information, and biotechnological innovation. Requiring financial advantages from corporations in sectors that depend on digital sequencing data (DSI) use was one choice.
Many points are nonetheless to be finalised, together with whether or not the funds could be disbursed to particular tasks or if a system must be devised to allocate cash per nation in keeping with biodiversity richness, Schomaker says.
“We’re very optimistic, as are the co-chairs, they usually have one of the best really feel for the place events stand,” she tells Dialogue Earth. “We got here to this dialogue principally with an empty slate, however we left after 5 days and nights with a draft advice that has narrowed down the coverage choices to a really clear set.”
Forward of COP16, a technical group will take into account the practicalities of how such a mechanism will work, with a draft settlement anticipated to be finalised at COP16. Regardless of the complexities of the problem, Schomaker is upbeat concerning the potential for a deal. Although negotiators had completely different views, it was “a particularly constructive” dialogue, she says.
“All people there desires to have that resolution by COP16, as a result of we wish corporations to begin paying for the knowledge they use, and since we’d like the cash. As soon as we come to COP, with all of the added vitality and the political stress that brings, we expect we are able to get it throughout the ending line,” she says.
Finance on the desk
The DSI negotiations are a part of the multi-pronged method agreed by governments in Montreal to finance the targets of the World Biodiversity Framework. Different sources embody a brand new fund to channel public cash to nature, boosting contributions from the personal sector and greening monetary techniques, and reforming subsidies that hurt nature.
There appears to be little motion on subsidy reform to date. Environmentally dangerous subsidies elevated by 55 per cent to US$1.7 trillion between 2022 and 2023, pushed largely by a doubling of help for fossil gas consumption, in keeping with the United Nations Surroundings Programme’s newest annual report on finance for nature.
Schomaker admits the problem of subsidies is “very, very tough”. “We’re conscious of the pattern, however we’re additionally conscious that, for instance, our host nation Colombia is phasing out subsidies for fossil fuels. So there may be additionally a counter pattern, and it’s about strengthening that,” she says.
“We hope there will likely be sturdy messages despatched that whereas we’re discussing spending more cash on biodiversity, this can’t be offset by subsidies being eight occasions the extent of cash spent on optimistic motion,” she provides.
Since COP15 in 2022, the World Biodiversity Framework Fund (GBFF) has been arrange. Nevertheless, solely seven international locations have made contributions to date, totalling US$244.61 million. Canada is by far the largest donor, contributing US$146.18 million, adopted by Germany, which donated US$43.75 million.
Schomaker acknowledges that the variety of international locations which have stepped up to date is inadequate. “We’re in fact speaking to governments, and governments are speaking amongst one another, about strengthen the capitalisation of the fund.”
On the identical time, the UN’s World Surroundings Facility has taken steps to make sure funds may be disbursed shortly and flexibly as soon as they’re out there, she says. 4 tasks have been authorized and can obtain a share of US$39.8 million, with one other 18 tasks below growth.
The enterprise and philanthropic sectors additionally have to foot a part of the invoice for biodiversity, she provides. The variety of companies attending COP16 will likely be larger than at COP15.
Stepping up finance for biodiversity is as a lot about official growth help as it’s about home finance, mobilisation, and contributions from governments and companies, she says, including: “To not detract from the obligations of donors, however this world mechanism on access- and benefit-sharing from genetic sequencing data can generate important quantities of cash for biodiversity.
“That’s why it’s so vital that we truly deliver this course of to a conclusion and agree on how this mechanism will work at COP16,” she says.
The individuals’s COP
The Colombian presidency of COP16 has given the occasion the tagline “the individuals’s COP”, reflecting the necessity to begin a brand new motion for biodiversity and produce all components of society to the COP, Schomaker notes. That is vital to keep away from the type of opposition to motion for nature seen within the EU, the place farmers took to the streets to protest towards the bloc’s Nature Restoration Legislation, she says.
“The entire world has been watching this debate. For some purpose, it ended up with the juxtaposition of agriculture and nature, and that, in fact, is completely false. That’s why the COP is about bringing all actors on board, to make it possible for the voice of farmers is being heard as insurance policies are being developed,” she says.
Schomaker acknowledges this may occasionally sound like “quite a lot of optimistic speak” however stresses: “It may be executed”.
At COP16, international locations will talk about establishing a brand new subsidiary physique for Indigenous peoples and native communities to strengthen their voices because the biodiversity framework is carried out, she says.
COP16 is the primary of three main UN setting conferences going down in fast succession. Governments signed as much as the UN Framework Conference on Local weather Change (UNFCCC) and the UN Conference to Fight Desertification (UNCCD) will meet in November and December.
Schomaker is adamant that the conventions have to work extra in synergy, confessing that that is her “favorite topic”. She believes that workstreams below the conventions have to be introduced collectively extra concretely at a nationwide degree, to keep away from, for instance, nationwide local weather plans and nationwide biodiversity plans being developed in silos below completely different ministries.
Nevertheless, she says: “The synergy debate has by no means been as energetic as it’s this yr – there may be now a globally recognised narrative that the local weather, biodiversity, and land degradation crises are components of 1 disaster.”
This text was initially printed on Dialogue Earth below a Inventive Commons licence.
