Studying Time: 2 minutes
In a latest resolution, the Tamil Nadu Electrical energy Regulatory Fee (TNERC) resolved a dispute regarding excellent funds between M/s. Apraava Wind Power (Theni – Undertaking II) Personal Restricted and the Tamil Nadu Technology and Distribution Company (TANGEDCO). The dispute, originating from a petition filed by Apraava Wind Power, sought to handle a number of key points associated to cost obligations, late cost surcharges, and contractual amendments.
Apraava Wind Power petitioned the TNERC to declare TANGEDCO accountable for the cost of excellent quantities totaling ₹81,32,93,175/- as of September 30, 2023. Moreover, Apraava Wind Power requested TANGEDCO to create a cost safety mechanism for future tariff invoices and to amend present agreements to mirror a change within the petitioner’s identify.
Nevertheless, the petition encountered challenges concerning its classification and the relevant charges. The TNERC Registry objected to treating the petition as a miscellaneous one and insisted that it ought to be labeled as a Dispute Decision Petition, topic to greater charges. Regardless of Apraava Wind Power’s arguments, each the Registry and the Secretary of the Fee upheld the classification resolution, citing related rules and the absence of clear dispute decision grounds.
In the course of the proceedings, Apraava Wind Power tried to say its case based mostly on the Authorities of India Guidelines on Late Fee Surcharges (LPS). Nevertheless, the Fee discovered this argument to be a departure from the unique grounds introduced earlier than the Registry and Secretary. In the end, the Fee upheld the choice to categorise the petition as a Dispute Decision Petition, emphasizing the significance of regulatory compliance and statutory provisions.
Notably, Apraava Wind Power failed to handle the Registry’s issues concerning the absence of communication from TANGEDCO concerning legal responsibility denial. This lack of clarification additional weakened the petitioner’s place and bolstered the Fee’s resolution.
In conclusion, the TNERC’s ruling underscores the significance of adherence to regulatory procedures and price buildings in resolving disputes throughout the power sector. Regardless of the petitioner’s efforts to problem the classification, the Fee upheld its resolution based mostly on statutory provisions and regulatory pointers. Shifting ahead, Apraava Wind Power is directed to refile its petition with the suitable charges, making certain compliance with regulatory necessities.
This resolution highlights the Fee’s dedication to truthful and clear dispute decision mechanisms, contributing to the general stability and integrity of the power sector in Tamil Nadu.
Please view the doc right here for extra particulars.
