In a hard-won battle between island states and African international locations in South Korea in July, the Philippines was chosen as host of the loss and harm fund by a board created on the United Nations (UN) local weather change summit in Dubai final yr. The loss and harm fund is a world finance mechanism to supply compensation for losses and damages from climate-induced disasters.
Though its position as nation host doesn’t give the Philippines precedence in accessing local weather funds, it is going to permit the climate-vulnerable nation the “ethical suasion” to hunt contributions to the pool of cash, mentioned Mark Joven, the Southeast Asian nation’s consultant to the loss and harm fund board.
That is what the Philippines has got down to do at COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan in November, mentioned Joven, who led the nation’s bid to host the fund.
“For such an endeavor [of seeking pledges] to work, you would wish to have prepared entry to all international locations. The most important [climate] occasion yearly is COP, the place plenty of leaders might be. It’ll make pledging considerably simpler for the Philippines,” Joven, a former undersecretary of finance, instructed Eco-Enterprise.
“
There isn’t any dedication from the Philippine authorities to truly put cash into the fund. However by advantage of being the host, it’s essential for us to muster monetary sources from accomplice international locations with a purpose to ratchet up the loss and harm fund.
Mark Joven, Philippine consultant, loss and harm fund board
As of final yr’s local weather summit in Dubai, rich international locations most chargeable for the local weather emergency have pledged a mixed whole of greater than US$700 million to the fund, which has not been added to since then. That monetary outlay is the equal of lower than 0.2 per cent of the irreversible financial and non-economic losses growing international locations are dealing with from world heating yearly.
Joven, a regulation professor on the College of the Philippines and presently a fellow for public administration at Harvard College, speaks to Eco-Enterprise in an unique interview about his hopes for a fund that goals to assist international locations most weak to local weather change.
What is predicted of the Philippines as nation host to the loss and harm fund board at COP29?
There isn’t any dedication from the Philippine authorities to truly put cash into the fund. However by advantage of being the host, it’s essential for us to muster monetary sources from accomplice international locations with a purpose to ratchet up the loss and harm fund. On the worldwide stage, the Philippines has plenty of affect to ask governments to place in some token quantity. It is going to be a great sign for a very weak middle-income nation just like the Philippines to symbolically present cash by convincing different like-minded international locations to place in funds, which is able to hopefully snowball right into a extra significant loss and harm fund. Clearly proper now, it’s not significant.
Other than soliciting pledges for the fund, does the operate of nation host stay logistical and secretarial in nature for future board conferences?
Sure. The funding selections offered by the loss and harm fund are decided by its board of administrators, not the host. The Philippines is not going to all the time have a consultant on the loss and harm fund board. In some unspecified time in the future we might be rotated out of it as a result of there are solely 26 members on this planet, and there are solely 26 administrators. In as far as lively or heavy handed intervention goes, that’s one thing that our authorities can not do.
What concepts does the board need to stretch the US$700 million loss and harm fund?
You possibly can go from the least formidable to essentially the most formidable. The least is the plain backyard selection bilateral donations from growing international locations. You then transfer in the direction of the correct of the spectrum, into cooperation initiatives with multilateral improvement banks, you then may take into account partnerships with large non-government organisations just like the Gates Basis or Bloomberg Basis. Within the far proper of the spectrum, you’ve a world system which calls for setting apart cash from high-emitting industries. For instance, there have been proposals to get a part of the cash from transport or air journey. That’s the spectrum of prospects in as far as fundraising is anxious.
Loss and harm, as one of many three pillars of local weather finance, remains to be not a part of the brand new local weather finance aim primarily based on the excessive stage conferences in Baku forward of COP29. What occurs if it will likely be excluded from the new collective quantified aim (NCQG) scope through the November negotiations?
I don’t assume [it will be excluded from the NCQG]. COP27 arrange the fund and it was operationalised in Dubai final yr, so it already exists.The primordial query right here is, how formidable will the loss and harm agenda be?
The world requirement for annual loss and harm is round US$300 billion by 2030, so if the quantity referred to as for is US$1 trillion, then loss and harm ought to account for a 3rd of it, divided equally between adaptation and mitigation.
However then once more, how can we demand for US$1 trillion when the US$100 billion settlement has not even been produced but? [Poor countries were promised US$100 billion a year in climate finance by 2020 by developed country governments more than a decade ago. Rich countries missed the longstanding pledge but claimed to have achieved it in 2022.]
If we had been going to extend the worldwide requirement for local weather finance to US$1 trillion, there are just a few methods to go about it – international locations settle for in precept, after which come implementation time, we encounter issues or international locations simply reject it outright.
Metro Manila’s enterprise district contrasts with a slum space. The loss and harm board assembly might be held for the primary time within the Philippine capital on the primary week of December 2024. It is going to be the final assembly of the board for the yr, following classes within the United Arab Emirates, South Korea and Azerbaijan. Picture: Jannie Lou Trijo
Are you able to inform us extra concerning the “small-grants window” that’s set to be carried out within the fund, and the way this differs from different UN local weather funding mechanisms like Inexperienced Local weather Fund (GCF)?
Having a small grants window within the loss and harm fund means the cash’s audit course of is truncated or simplified. Smaller international locations have direct entry to funds, with out going via accredited entities (like improvement banks or authorities division), which the GCF doesn’t have.
Conventional accreditation strategies just like the GCF’s signifies that for every undertaking to be carried out, you’ll need to undergo the World Financial institution, ADB or UNICEF, which prices cash.
The loss and harm fund can even have funds assist the place a mortgage might be given on to the federal government after which deployed for a undertaking. Not like GCF initiatives, we can not look forward to an idea be aware for the funds for reconstruction to be accredited and carried out for a hurricane.
What are the benefits of the Philippines internet hosting the loss and harm enjoyable reasonably than small island growing states (SIDS) or African international locations, which additionally bid to be nation host?
Each the Philippines and SIDS are significantly weak international locations, however what differentiates us is the demographics within the economic system. The populations of SIDS is sub 1 million folks. The Philippines, alternatively, is a minimum of 100 occasions larger by way of inhabitants and a number of other magnitudes larger by way of geography.
Because the host nation, it means we’re allowed the chance to level the highlight to greater international locations dealing with loss and harm issues, not simply the Philippines. International locations like Pakistan and Bangladesh which even have larger populations than the Philippines endure considerably from flooding and heavy quantity rain storms, which drastically impacts their economies.
As for African least developed international locations, the distinction between us and them is the inhabitants. They’ve large tracts of land however the inhabitants is comparatively sparse. Our distinctive character is that now we have the chance to indicate the world how a lot is required to make the loss and harm fund work. If a state with a small inhabitants was the host, displaying the plight of nations affected by loss and harm might be much less efficient.
What are the disadvantages of the Philippines being nation host?
It could not be sensible for the Philippines to have pure grants [in receving the loss and damage funds].
SIDS and least developed international locations insist on pure grants as a financing modality. However once you cope with larger international locations just like the Philippines, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, now we have a capital market system, which we’ve developed the place we are able to borrow cash at an inexpensive curiosity price with a purpose to fund our effort.
In that sense, we want the cash lower than they do, so it may be an obstacle. However it may be a bonus as a result of we are able to mix cash – authorities will get financing from the worldwide capital markets and blends it with the quantity offered by the loss and harm fund with a purpose to implement or deploy the cash to affected folks.
What excites you essentially the most concerning the Philippines taking part in host to the loss and harm fund board?
We get a greater view of the place [the funds] are going. The issue with the United Nations Framework Conference on Local weather Change is that they’re a small organisation, such that generally they don’t successfully talk the place the funds are going. For instance, have you ever heard of the initiatives of the difference fund? Seemingly no. If the board was hosted in another nation, the probability of us understanding what’s believed on this area may be very low as a result of they don’t have the aptitude to flow into what’s being finished.
