Vitality Return On Funding Rears Its Misshapen Head Once more

Join each day information updates from CleanTechnica on e-mail. Or comply with us on Google Information!

Over the previous yr or so, power return on power invested (EREOI) has proven up a number of occasions for me as an assault on applied sciences at the moment are superior. A nuclear delivery advocate tried to gotcha me with that for biofuels for delivery. Others moderately requested about it for biofuels typically. And there’s numerous disinformation floating round about fossil fuels vs renewables, being unfold by the fossil gasoline business.

It’s time for some disambiguation.

Let’s begin with what EREOI is. Fairly easy, truly. It takes power to get power right into a kind usable by us, whether or not that’s extracting and refining oil or constructing a wind turbine. The ratio between the power you get out versus the power you place in is the EREOI. And to be clear, it’s over the lifetime of the manufacturing from the asset, whether or not it’s an oil effectively, a hydroelectric dam or a wind turbine.

Agriculture makes power within the type of energy which we eat. The agricultural revolution 10,000 years in the past resulted in a extra constructive EREOI than looking and gathering, so civilization arose. A constructive EREOI is fairly good for us. The Inexperienced Revolution doubled EREOI to about 4:1, so now we have now much more meals for lots much less work. In actual fact, we make a lot meals as of late that we throw away a 3rd of it globally, about 2.5 billion tons, one thing which is a significant local weather headache as a result of waste meals finally ends up emitting numerous methane which is lots worse for international warming than carbon dioxide.

It was that oil had actually good EREOI, from 18-43:1. When it simply bubbles out of the bottom, all you need to do is cap it. Standard gasoline was good as effectively, from 20-40:1. Stick a steel straw within the floor and low cost gasoline comes out. Coal has an EREOI within the 40s as effectively.

That’s an enormous purpose why the Industrial Revolution occurred, as a result of there was an terrible lot of low cost, simply extracted fossil fuels mendacity in regards to the place. What’s that? Low-cost, simply extracted fossil fuels aren’t as available as they as soon as have been? We’re utilizing unconventional extraction methods like shale fracturing for oil and gasoline, and steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) for oil sands crude. These methods use much more power. What does that do to their EREOI?

Nicely, shale oil’s EREOI plummets to 1-2:1, beneath antiquated agriculture. Oil sands SAGD plummets to three.5-5.4:1, about the identical as fashionable agriculture. Fracked gasoline has an EREOI of 5-10:1. Coal stays excessive, principally as a result of we’ve stopped mining for it and began simply disassembling mountains from the highest down with heavy equipment.

There’s a sport the fossil gasoline business likes to play with unconventional fossil gasoline extraction to fake the EREOI is larger, by the way in which. What they do is use plenty of the fossil fuels that they’re extracting to energy the method of extracting fossil fuels. This, after all, is totally unabated which means a lot larger greenhouse gasoline emissions, and it’s a fallacious financial argument as a result of they’re clearly paying the chance value of not promoting the fuels. Burning the home all the way down to warmth it isn’t precisely smart, and they’re doing that in two alternative ways.

After which there’s the most likely of oil and gasoline effectively lifetimes. Pure ones have lengthy lifetimes with low annual proportion drops, however shale and fracked wells for oil and gasoline see declines of 15% to twenty% per yr. That may considerably throw off

To be clear, there’s additionally one thing referred to as the power cliff. Under an EREOI of about 5, the price per unit of power begins taking pictures upward making numerous as soon as financial issues deeply uneconomic from a systemic perspective. Sure, shale oil and the oil sands are within the zone of financial doom.

As we’ve seen above, there are a number of methods to play with EREOI to get the outcomes you need. A basic one for the fossil gasoline business is to disregard unconventional oil and gasoline, that are just about each marginal barrel and gigajoule of oil and use solely legacy oil. However we’re more and more utilizing unconventional methods as a result of numerous the high-EREOI wells have dried up and that’s persevering with yearly.

That’s why we’re drilling within the Arctic and beneath the North Sea and deeper than ever. The identical technical innovation that has made Hubbert’s Peak Oil Provide merely a daunting story earlier than mattress has additionally decreased the EREOI of each marginal unit of power we extract now.

After which they prefer to ignore the extra speedy declines of fracked wells too, pretending that they’re going to last more, spreading there preliminary fracking power over vastly extra barrels or gigajoules. Yeah, not so quick.

After which the identical sorts, for instance Goehring & Rozencwajg Associates, LLC, a hardcore fossil fuels funding agency which likes to check with itself as contrarian, unfold huge disinformation about renewables.

So lets speak about wind, water and photo voltaic.

Hydroelectric, as a result of dams final so lengthy, have one of the best EREOI’s going, typically over 100:1. Can’t beat an excellent dam, however you can also’t construct one with solely non-public cash. The USA’s largest ones have been all constructed by the federal authorities through the New Offers and are nonetheless owned and operated by it via the Bureau of Land Administration. China’s Three Gorges Dam and the dam in Nepal they’re constructing that dwarfs it, in addition to the smaller dams they’ve constructed over the previous 20 years, are all nationwide tasks, not entrepreneur’s tasks. When an asset is predicted to have a lifetime over 100 years, it’s arduous to get pure markets focused on it.

There are a few simple methods to sport renewables’ technology down, and disinformation distributors like GRA use each one they will. Let’s begin with wind power. Let’s decide wind power from the Nineteen Nineties or 2000s as an alternative of contemporary wind farms which might be a lot larger and have significantly better capability elements. Let’s fake that wind farms don’t final so long as they do. Play these foolish video games and fairly quickly you might have crappy EREOI’s for wind power.

What’s the trendy actuality? 19-20:1. Hmmm. Isn’t {that a} lengthy, good distance above all unconventional fossil fuels? I imply, a extremely good distance? And a extremely good distance above any issues about humanity falling off of a cliff?

What’s one other foolish sport that the business likes to play? How about pretending {that a} barrel of oil’s 1,700 kWh of warmth power is the same as 1,700 kWh from a wind turbine? Are they? Not an opportunity.

Let’s take an inside combustion automobile versus an electrical automobile. Let’s take 1,700 kWh value of petroleum out of the bottom and get the power to the wheels of the automobile. How environment friendly is that course of? About 20%. About 80% of the power will get thrown away, principally as waste warmth alongside the way in which, though clearly numerous power will get thrown away for unconventional gasoline and oil lengthy earlier than it will get to a automobile.

In the meantime, let’s go wind turbine to an electrical automobile’s wheels. How environment friendly is that course of? About 80%. Waste warmth once more within the type of transferring via wires and out and in of the battery, however nonetheless, 4 occasions extra environment friendly than effectively to wheel.

How about gasoline effectively to gasoline furnace? That’s fairly good, after the gasoline is extracted. It’s a fairly simple molecule to place via pipelines and fashionable furnaces are fairly good. Nicely to warmth effectivity is about 70% on common, significantly better than if you happen to have been making an attempt to get work out of it.

However what about photo voltaic panels to warmth pumps? Photo voltaic EREOI is 10:1 and sharp eyes will observe the non-coincidence that the ratio between photo voltaic capability elements and wind capability elements is about the identical as EREOI to EREOI for the kinds. One of many video games the fossil gasoline business likes to play is utilizing rooftop photo voltaic EREOI, 5-6:1 as an alternative of photo voltaic farms larger EREOI. Apples to apples is value remembering and searching for.

Transmitting and distributing electrical energy is much more environment friendly than pure gasoline, about 5% losses from photo voltaic farm to warmth pump vs 7% of effectively to furnace. However warmth pumps get a mean of three models of power of warmth out of the setting for each unit of power you get into them. Which means with the relative efficiencies, you get 4 occasions as a lot warmth from electrical energy from photo voltaic panels as you do gasoline from a effectively.

GRA and others use the first power fallacy, that warmth power is the same as electrical energy, when you may get vastly extra work out of the identical quantity of electrical energy, to make renewables look dangerous and fossil fuels look good. And naturally they ignore warmth pumps totally.

An electrified world powered by renewables is a vastly extra environment friendly world. I replicated one thing that many have performed, simply because I prefer to run the numbers myself. The USA, for example the place the information is offered and effectively defined sufficient to work with, would require about 50% as a lot major power within the type of low-carbon wind, water, photo voltaic (principally) and nuclear and geothermal, as they pump into the system right now, in the event that they have been absolutely electrified.

The doom and gloom degrowth crowd have a tendency to not like a lot of these analyses both, though some notice that after we cease extracting virtually 20 billion tons of fossil fuels to principally burn yearly, that’s truly an enormous financial shift. The agricultural agrarian fantasists definitely don’t prefer it.

However the fossil gasoline business simply hates the fact of this. What it makes clear is that the transition is far simpler than they’re pretending. It makes clear that the creating world can leapfrog numerous the high-inefficiency power flows that the developed world went via, and the creating world is, with plenty of electrical automobiles and renewables arising around the globe.

Do you know two and three wheeled electrical automobiles have prevented extra barrels of oil than all the remainder of the electrical automobiles on this planet mixed? That’s what BNEF reported final yr. The place are these small electrical automobiles? Nicely, tons and many them are within the creating world, the place vehicles are a lot much less widespread.

As for bioefuls? Nicely, meta-analyses of a bunch of biofuels tasks discover that they’ve an EREOI beneath agriculture’s 4:1, however above 3:1. That is smart. Creating biofuels requires principally actually outdated applied sciences like fermentation and distillation. The EREOI isn’t nice, however it’s adequate so long as we protect it for locations the place it’s actually wanted, like lengthy haul delivery and aviation. We’ll use battery and grid tied electrical for the remainder of transportation.

However what about artificial fuels made with inexperienced hydrogen? Nicely, we’re taking electrical energy with is actually environment friendly at doing work or absurdly environment friendly at delivering warmth via warmth pumps and as an alternative throwing huge quantities of it away to make consumable fuels which run via inside combustion engines that function at 20% effectivity with excessive EREOI fossil fuels. We’re effectively beneath biofuels, and a good distance beneath the place contemplating the benefit order of what else we may very well be doing with inexperienced electrical energy.

It’s fairly simple for individuals who ought to in any other case know higher to be caught by this. The fossil gasoline business has had a long time to determine easy methods to idiot individuals with these things. Very vibrant, effectively educated and effectively which means individuals who don’t spend a lot time take a look at renewables, transmission, storage and electrification are simply fooled into considering that the business’s disinformation is credible.

The explanation I used to be triggered to sprint off this text was as a result of a type of individuals was ensnared by the dangerous arguments and amplified them right now. Don’t be that particular person.